ArticleArchives of microbiology2022
Cryopreservation of stool samples altered the microbial viability quantitively and compositionally.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human Microbiota-Associated Pig Models for Translational Microbiome Research: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Investigation of Storage Conditions and Quality Control Markers for Metabolites and Lipids in Human Feces.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Stabilized and unstabilized sampling methods result in differential fecal 16S rRNA microbial sequencing results.PloS one · 2025Article
- Laboratory preparation methods for human-derived fecal microbial suspensions for fecal microbiota transplantation: a review and standardization perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Impact of cryoprotective agents on human gut microbes and in vitro stabilized artificial gut microbiota communities.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Effect of in vitro cultivation on human gut microbiota composition using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and metabolomics approach.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stool is the most commonly used sample for gut microbiota analysis in humans and animals. Cryopreservation of stool at - 80 °C is a feasible and simple method in clinics and researches, especially in large-scale cohort studies. However, the viability of bacteria in stool after freezing has yet well-demonstrated quantitatively and compositionally. This study determined the viable microbiota of samples under cryopreservation at - 80 °C, relative to fresh samples and that stored at ambient. Stool samples were collected from three healthy adults. Propidium monoazide treatment combined with quantitative PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to target viable microbiota. After freezing, the number of viable bacteria decreased, though inter-individual difference existed. Notably, the alpha diversity of viable microbiota after freezing did not change significantly, while its composition changed. Freezing significantly reduced the viable bacteria in Gram-negative genera of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, and proportionally increased Gram-positive bacteria in genera of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, including Bifidobacterium, Collinsella and Blautia, implying that the cell envelope structure associated with the bacterial sensitivity to freezing. On the contrary, the room temperature storage not only decreased the number of viable bacteria, but also decreased the microbial alpha diversity, and remarkably enriched facultative anaerobes of Escherichia-Shigella, Enterococcus and Lactococcus, some of which are opportunistic pathogens. Our findings suggested that changes in viable microbiota in stool samples caused by cryopreservation should be paid enough attention for downstream utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.