ReviewAnnals of hematology2022
Treatment for relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors and kinetics of ATO-induced leukocytosis in acute promyelocytic leukemia patients: a retrospective study.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Survival analysis and prognosis model construction of elderly patients with acute promyelocyticleukemia: a retrospective study based on SEER database.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Review
- Pharmaceutical/Clinical Strategies in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: All-Trans Retinoic Acid Encapsulation by Spray-Drying Technology as an Innovative Approach-Comprehensive Overview.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Chemotherapy-free treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia: the pediatric view of a revolutionary tale.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has significantly improved the outcomes of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); nevertheless, a small fraction of patients still experience relapse. Due to the infrequency of APL relapse coupled with the rapid change in the therapeutic landscape, there are limited available data regarding the treatment of relapsed APL. In this situation, however, ATO-based therapy has been shown to result in high rates of hematological and molecular complete remission (CR). Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is considered the postremission therapy of choice when patients achieve molecular CR, whereas recent studies have suggested that molecular CR is not prerequisite for the success of autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT can be reserved for selected patients, i.e., those who cannot achieve CR and those who relapse after autologous HCT, because of high toxicities and the expectation of highly favorable outcomes with autologous HCT during CR. For patients who are ineligible for HCT, prolonged administration of ATRA + ATO would be a viable option. To further refine the therapy for patients with relapsed APL, it is imperative to aggregate clinical data of patients who relapse after the ATRA + ATO frontline therapy within the framework of national and international collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.