Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972560›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of medicine2022

Use of preventive measures, beliefs and information received about COVID-19 and their effects on mental health, in two stages of the pandemic in Colombia.

Juan Gómez-Salgado, Fredy Pomares-Herrera, Javier Fagundo-Rivera, Mónica Ortega-Moreno, Juan Jesús García-Iglesias, Carlos Ruiz-Frutos

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Juan Gómez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-7730
Fredy Pomares-HerreraFaculty of Medicine, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4740-7858
Javier Fagundo-RiveraCentro Universitario de Enfermería Cruz Roja, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8286-3381
Mónica Ortega-MorenoDepartment of Economy, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3317-9898
Juan Jesús García-IglesiasDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-0399
Carlos Ruiz-FrutosDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-1382
Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · ECUniversidad de Huelva · ESHospital Central de la Cruz Roja San José y Santa Adela · ESUniversity of Cartagena · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have highlighted the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on both physical and mental health. The aim of this study is to analyse the effects on mental health in two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020 and February 2021) in the population of Colombia.

methodsObservational, prospective, cross-sectional study along two periods, April 2020 and February 2021. The sample (

resultsA higher level of PD was observed among women (

conclusionsBetter information on the effects and preventive measures to prevent the pandemic improves confidence in the health system and its professionals, reducing the level of PD. There is a need for quality information on social networks and an adaptation of telemedicine to address the pandemic effects on mental health.Key messagesPsychological distress (PD) decreased in February 2021, as compared to April 2020, due to a greater use of preventive measures against COVID-19, and the confidence on the recommendations made by health officials and professionals.Higher PD has been found in women and people who lived without a partner, in line with studies performed in other countries.The accessibility to quality information on the pandemic should be promoted by the Official Health Authorities, thus counteracting data that could be classified as "fake news".

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMental HealthMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19informationknowledgemental healthpreventive measuresPsychological distresssocial media

Identifiers

PMID35972560
PMCPMC9389929
OpenAlexW4292184479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.