Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972539›Full record

Observational studyPediatric surgery international2022

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a diagnostic tool in pediatric acute appendicitis: a prospective validation study.

Javier Arredondo Montero, Giuseppa Antona, Carlos Bardají Pascual, Mónica Bronte Anaut, Raquel Ros Briones, Amaya Fernández-Celis, Adriana Rivero Marcotegui, Natalia López-Andrés, Nerea Martín-Calvo

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javier Arredondo MonteroPediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. jarredondom@alumni.unav.es.
Giuseppa AntonaPediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Carlos Bardají PascualPediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Mónica Bronte AnautPathology Department, Hospital Universitario de Araba, Vitoria, Spain.
Raquel Ros BrionesPediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Amaya Fernández-CelisCardiovascular Translational Research, NavarraBiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Adriana Rivero MarcoteguiClinical Analysis Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Natalia López-AndrésCardiovascular Translational Research, NavarraBiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Nerea Martín-CalvoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Navarrabiomed · ESHospital Universitario Araba · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNGAL has recently been studied as a biomarker in the diagnostic context of pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA), although existing series are scarce and have limited sample sizes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective observational study was designed to validate serum NGAL as a diagnostic tool in PAA. This study included 215 patients, divided into 3 groups: (1) patients undergoing major outpatient surgery (n = 63), (2) patients with non-surgical abdominal pain in whom a diagnosis of PAA was excluded (n = 53) and (3) patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAA (n = 99). Patients in group 3 were divided into complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis. In 201 patients, a serum sample was obtained at the time of diagnosis and NGAL concentration was determined by ELISA. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess normality. Comparative statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Fisher's exact test. To calculate the discriminative ability of the molecule, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) was calculated. A p value < 0.05 established statistical significance.

resultsMedian (interquartile range) of serum NGAL values were 38.88 (27.15-48.04) ng/mL (group 1), 51.84 (37.33-69.80) ng/mL (group 2) and 65.06 (50.50-86.60) ng/mL (group 3). The AUC (group 2 vs 3) was 0.642 (95% CI 0.542-0.741) (p < 0.001) and the best cutoff point was found to be at 40.97 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 34.6%. No statistically significant differences in serum NGAL values were found between patients with uncomplicated PAA and those with complicated PAA.

conclusionsThis prospective validation study with a large sample size confirms that the diagnostic yield of NGAL in the context of PAA is only moderate, and therefore, it should not be used as a unique diagnostic tool. Furthermore, NGAL is not a valid biomarker to discern between uncomplicated and complicated PAA.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAppendicitisAcute DiseaseBiomarkersChildHumansLipocalin-2Predictive Value of TestsROC CurveBiomarkersLCN2 protein, humanLipocalin-224p3AUCDiagnosticGelatinaseLCN2LipocalinNeutrophilNGALPediatric acute appendicitisROCSensitivitySiderocalinSpecificity

Identifiers

PMID35972539
PMCPMC9519728
OpenAlexW4292057559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.