Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972432›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Widefield OCT Imaging for Quantifying Inner Retinal Thickness in the Nonhuman Primate.

Varsha Venkata Srinivasan, Siddarth Das, Nimesh Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the relationship between 24-2 visual field and widefield optical coherence tomography data across healthy, glaucoma suspect and glaucoma eyes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterisation of the normal human ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer using widefield optical coherence tomography.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Varsha Venkata SrinivasanUniversity of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX, USA.
Siddarth DasUniversity of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX, USA.
Nimesh PatelUniversity of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX, USA.
University of Houston · US

Funding

Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI LAURA J. FRISHMAN · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Relating Structure to Function in Optic NeuropathiesR01EY029229 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI Nimesh Bhikhu Patel · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the agreement and repeatability of inner retinal thickness measures from widefield imaging compared to standard scans in healthy nonhuman primates. Methods: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were acquired from 30 healthy rhesus monkeys, with 11 animals scanned at multiple visits. The scan protocol included 20° × 20° raster scans centered on the macula and optic nerve head (ONH), a 12° diameter circular scan centered on the ONH, and a 55 × 45° widefield raster scan. Each scan was segmented using custom neural network-based algorithms. Bland-Altman analysis were used for comparing average circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness for a 16° diameter region. Comparisons were also made for similar 1° × 1° superpixels from the raster scans. Results: Average circumpapillary RNFL thickness from the circular scan was 114.2 ± 5.8 µm, and 113.2 ± 7.3 µm for an interpolated scan path from widefield imaging (bias = -1.03 µm, 95% limits of agreement [LOA] -8.6 to 6.5 µm). GCIPL thickness from standard raster scans was 72.7 ± 4.3 µm, and 73.7 ± 3.7 µm from widefield images (bias = 1.0 µm, 95% LOA -2.4 to 4.4 µm). Repeatability for both RNFL and GCIPL standard analysis was less than 5.2 µm. For 1° × 1° superpixels, the 95% limits of agreement were between -13.9 µm and 13.7 µm for RNFL thickness and -2.5 µm and 2.5 µm for GCIPL thickness. Conclusions: Inner retinal thickness measures from widefield imaging have good repeatability and are comparable to those measured using standard scans. Translational Relevance: Monitoring retinal ganglion cell loss in the non-human primate experimental glaucoma model could be enhanced using widefield imaging.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaOptic DiskAnimalsNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID35972432
PMCPMC9396678
OpenAlexW4292061908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.