Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972325›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2022

Support for cancer prevention public health policies: results from a nationally representative sample of residents in the United States.

Trevin E Glasgow, Carrie A Miller, Kandace P McGuire, Devon C Freudenberger, Bernard F Fuemmeler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trevin E GlasgowDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2720-3425
Carrie A MillerDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Kandace P McGuireDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Devon C FreudenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Bernard F FuemmelerDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Virginia Commonwealth University IRADCAK12GM093857 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL C BULLARD, John J Ryan · 2010 to 2026
$7.0M
Training Program in Cancer Prevention and Control and Cancer Health Equity (CPC-CHE)T32CA093423 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Bernard F Fuemmeler, Oxana G Palesh · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA093423NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM093857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing public support of health policies designed to reduce cancer risk is important for policy implementation. This study aimed to identify support for cancer prevention policies and factors associated with support. Data were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Support for three types of cancer prevention policies were evaluated: tobacco, alcohol, and junk food regulations. Linear and logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the relationship between support for the different types of policies and sociodemographic, lifestyle behaviors, and cancer beliefs. Certain policies, such as providing warning labels on cigarettes (69.9% support) and requiring specific health warnings on alcohol containers (65.1% support), were popular. Banning outdoor advertising of alcohol was not popular (34.4% support). There were individual differences associated with policy support. For example, respondents who were 75 years or older (B = 0.61, p < .001) or female (B = 0.14, p < .008) were more likely to support tobacco polices compared to their counterparts (i.e., younger or male). Respondents who identified as politically conservative (B = -0.20, p < .004) or those who endorsed high cancer fatalistic beliefs (e.g., there's not much you can do to lower your chances of getting cancer, B = -0.07, p < .012) were less likely to support alcohol policies compared to those who were liberal or had lower cancer fatalistic beliefs. Generally, support was high for most policy questions. However, support varied by different individual factors. The findings also highlight that there may be opportunities to increase understanding and awareness about cancer prevention policies, especially among some segments of the population.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTobacco ProductsFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMalePublic PolicySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAlcoholCancer preventionDietPublic health policyTobacco

Identifiers

PMID35972325
PMCPMC9802572
OpenAlexW4292062772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.