Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971917›Full record

ArticleMycoses2022

Current situation of endemic mycosis in the Americas and the Caribbean: Proceedings of the first international meeting on endemic mycoses of the Americas (IMEMA).

Diego H Caceres, Laura C Echeverri Tirado, Alexandro Bonifaz, Antoine Adenis, Beatriz L Gomez, Claudia Lizette Banda Flores, Cristina E Canteros, Daniel Wagner Santos, Eduardo Arathoon, Elia Ramirez Soto and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycoses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Recent drug development and treatments for fungal infections.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Antifungal stewardship: the Latin American experience.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023
    Review
  20. Molecular Diagnosis of Endemic Mycoses.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Diego H CaceresCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-9809
Laura C Echeverri TiradoMedical Mycology Group, School of Medicine, Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Alexandro BonifazHospital General de Mexico Dr Eduardo Liceaga, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2045-3317
Antoine AdenisCentre d'Investigation Clinique Antilles Guyane Inserm 1424, Cayenne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4000-4981
Beatriz L GomezStudies in Translational Microbiology and Emerging Diseases (MICROS) Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.
Claudia Lizette Banda FloresUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH), Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Cristina E CanterosDepartamento de Micología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas (INEI), Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS) "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán", Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-9340
Daniel Wagner SantosDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, UFMA, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Eduardo ArathoonAsociación de Salud Integral, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Elia Ramirez SotoCentro Nacional de Enfermedades Tropicales (CENETROP), Santa Cruz, Bolivia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6192-1610
Flavio Queiroz-TellesDepartment of Public Health, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7034-2418
Ilan S SchwartzDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-0281
Jeannete ZuritaFacultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-2588
Lisandra Serra DamascenoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-5912
Nataly GarciaSociedad Venezolana de Microbiología, Caracas, Venezuela.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-3728
Norma B FernandezSección Micologia, Division Infectología, Hospital de Clinicas "José de San Martín" Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Omayra ChinchaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH), Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-8555
Patricia AraujoDepartamento de Bacteriología y Micología, Laboratorio Central de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social, Asunción, Paraguay.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7546-1205
Ricardo RabagliatiDepartamento de Enfermedades Infecciosas del Adulto, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Tom ChillerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Gustavo GiusianoInstituto de Medicina Regional, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de Argentina (CONICET), Resistencia, Chaco, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-4158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Americas are home to biologically and clinically diverse endemic fungi, including Blastomyces, Coccidioides, Emergomyces, Histoplasma, Paracoccidioides and Sporothrix. In endemic areas with high risk of infection, these fungal pathogens represent an important public health problem.

objectivesThis report aims to summarise the main findings of the regional analysis carried out on the status of the endemic mycoses of the Americas, done at the first International Meeting on Endemic Mycoses of the Americas (IMEMA).

methodsA regional analysis for the Americas was done, the 27 territories were grouped into nine regions. A SWOT analysis was done.

resultsAll territories reported availability of microscopy. Seventy percent of territories reported antibody testing, 67% of territories reported availability of Histoplasma antigen testing. None of the territories reported the use of (1-3)-β-d-glucan. Fifty two percent of territories reported the availability of PCR testing in reference centres (mostly for histoplasmosis). Most of the territories reported access to medications such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and amphotericin B (AMB) deoxycholate. Many countries had limited access to liposomal formulation of AMB and newer azoles, such as posaconazole and isavuconazole. Surveillance of these fungal diseases was minimal.

conclusionsA consensus emerged among meeting participants, this group concluded that endemic mycoses are neglected diseases, and due to their severity and lack of resources, the improvement of diagnosis, treatment and surveillance is needed.

Indexed as

HistoplasmosisMycosesAmericasAntifungal AgentsHistoplasmaHumansItraconazoleAntifungal AgentsItraconazoleblastomycescoccidioideshistoplasmaparacoccidioides

Identifiers

PMID35971917
PMCPMC9804294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.