ArticleCancer research2022
Expanding the Full Potential of Liquid Biopsies for Lung Cancer Patients.
Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative infection risk factors in lung cancer patients after bronchoalveolar lavage.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Recent advances in liquid biopsy for precision oncology: emerging biomarkers and clinical applications in lung cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been tremendous therapeutic progress for advanced lung cancer, leading to the identification of a multitude of therapeutic targets and significantly expanding the list of potential target genes to be tested. However, precision oncology requires knowledge of the exact biology of the tumor through sequencing of the cancer genome, which is hampered by limited tissue availability in thoracic malignancies. Liquid biopsy, namely plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis, has expanded these opportunities and is now firmly established in the diagnostic algorithm of patients with lung cancer with metastatic disease. However, the full potential of this powerful tool has been largely underexplored. In this issue of Cancer Research, Nair and colleagues provide evidence of the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cfDNA profiling through an ultra-deep next-generation sequencing approach. The study findings support further development of BAL cfDNA analysis for tumor genotyping, besides the current gold standard sources (tissue and plasma), as a complementary tool in patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for tumor diagnosis and/or rebiopsy, increasing the success rates of genomic analyses. In addition, BAL cfDNA profiling might represent an important diagnostic tool in early-stage lung cancer, outperforming plasma cfDNA in stage I-II and detecting field cancerization signs, potentially identifying tumors before their clinical appearance. Further studies should confirm the full potential of BAL cfDNA profiling in lung cancer and its place in the large family of liquid biopsies. See related article by Nair et al., p. 2838.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.