ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2022
Reprogramming barriers in bovine cells nuclear transfer revealed by single-cell RNA-seq analysis.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Somatic Cell Cloning and Other Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Mammals: Which Determinants Have Been Unraveled Thus Far?-Current Status, Further Progress and Future Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Innovative Insights into Single-Cell Technologies and Multi-Omics Integration in Livestock and Poultry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Advances in single-cell transcriptomics in animal research.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- In vitro culture alters cell lineage composition and cellular metabolism of bovine blastocyst†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Article
- Single-Cell Sequencing Technology in Ruminant Livestock: Challenges and Opportunities.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- The impact of induced pluripotent stem cells in animal conservation.Veterinary research communications · 2024Review
- Deciphering the decisive factors driving fate bifurcations in somatic cell reprogramming.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Article
- Dynamic Changes in Proteome during Yak Oocyte Maturation Analyzed Using iTRAQ Technology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Bovine blastocyst-like structures derived from stem cell cultures.Cell stem cell · 2023Article
- Molecular Mechanism and Application of Somatic Cell Cloning in Mammals-Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Reprogramming barriers in bovine cells nuclear transfer revealed by single-cell RNA-seq analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Many progresses have recently been achieved in animal somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). However, embryos derived from SCNT rarely result in live births. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) can be used to investigate the development details of SCNT embryos. Here, bovine fibroblasts and three factors bovine iPSCs (3F biPSCs) were used as donors for bovine nuclear transfer, and the single blastomere transcriptome was analysed by scRNA-seq. Compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos, SCNT embryos exhibited many defects. Abnormally expressed genes were found at each stage of embryos, which enriched in metabolism, and epigenetic modification. The DEGs of the adjacent stage in SCNT embryos did not follow the temporal expression pattern similar to that of IVF embryos. Particularly, SCNT 8-cell stage embryos showed failures in some gene activation, including ZSCAN4, and defects in protein association networks which cored as POLR2K, GRO1, and ANKRD1. Some important signalling pathways also showed incomplete activation at SCNT zygote to morula stage. Interestingly, 3F biPSCNT embryos exhibited more dysregulated genes than SCNT embryos at zygote and 2-cell stage, including genes in KDM family. Pseudotime analysis of 3F biPSCNT embryos showed the different developmental fate from SCNT and IVF embryos. These findings suggested partial reprogrammed 3F biPS cells as donors for bovine nuclear transfer hindered the reprogramming of nuclear transfer embryos. Our studies revealed the abnormal gene expression and pathway activation of SCNT embryos, which could increase our understanding of the development of SCNT embryos and give hints to improve the efficiency of nuclear transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.