Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971636›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Evolution of infant feeding practices in children from 9 to 24 months, considering complementary feeding indicators and food processing: Results from the Brazilian cohort of the MAL-ED study.

Eva Débora de Oliveira Andrade, Amanda de Sousa Rebouças, José Q Filho, Ramya Ambikapathi, Laura E Caulfield, Aldo Ângelo Moreira Lima, Bruna Leal Lima Maciel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eva Débora de Oliveira AndradeGraduate Progam in Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Amanda de Sousa RebouçasDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
José Q FilhoInstitute of Biomedicine for Brazilian Semiarid, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9619-4553
Ramya AmbikapathiDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2013-2516
Laura E CaulfieldDepartment of International Health, Center for Human Nutrition, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Aldo Ângelo Moreira LimaInstitute of Biomedicine for Brazilian Semiarid, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Bruna Leal Lima MacielGraduate Progam in Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0724-1961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infant feeding practices impact children's nutritional and health status, influencing growth and development. This study aimed to analyse the evolution of infant feeding practices from 9 to 24 months of age, considering infant and young child feeding (IYCF) indicators and food processing. The infant feeding practices in children from the Brazilian site of the MAL-ED study were evaluated at 9 (n = 193), 15 (n = 182) and 24 months (n = 164) using 24-h dietary recalls. IYCF indicators were evaluated, and the extent of food processing was evaluated, using the NOVA classification. Breastfeeding declined significantly over time, from 77.6% at 9 months to 45.1% at 24 months. Although dietary diversity did not significantly change during the study period (80.5% at 24 months), the minimum acceptable diet significantly increased from 67.9% to 76.1% at 24 months (p < 0.0005). All the studied children consumed sweetened beverages from 9 months. Unhealthy food consumption and zero vegetable or fruit consumption significantly increased over time (p < 0.0005). Unprocessed food consumption decreased from 9 to 24 months of age (p < 0.0005), while ultra-processed food consumption increased (p < 0.0005) during the study period. Logistic regressions showed that, at 9 months, breastfed children presented a lower risk for ultra-processed food consumption (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-0.77); and children reaching the minimum acceptable diet presented more risk for ultra-processed food consumption (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.01-5.27). In conclusion, data showed a reduction in the quality of infant feeding practices over the first 2 years of life, with a decrease in breastfeeding and an increase in the consumption of unhealthy and ultra-processed foods.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBrazilBreast FeedingChildCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleFood HandlingHumansInfantInfant Foodbreastfeedingchildrencomplementary feedingultra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID35971636
PMCPMC9480934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.