ArticleGlobal implementation research and applications2022
Measuring the Success of a Project ECHO Implementation: Results from an International e-Delphi Study.
Article in Global implementation research and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to implementing the Project ECHO model: perspectives of 8 ECHO implementation teams.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Spread, participant experience, and implementation of Pallium Canada's Palliative Care ECHO project: a mixed methods study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Substance Use and Chronic Pain Management: Understanding the Learning Needs of Primary Care Clinicians Through Project ECHO.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Moving from crisis response to a learning health system: Experiences from an Australian regional primary care network.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Lessons learned implementing an innovative extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) program.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Project ECHOBMC health services research · 2024Article
- Turning Strategy into Action - Using the ECHO Model to Empower the Australian Workforce to Integrate Care.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an increasing global need for organisations to utilise high-quality telementoring models to support workforce development and mentorship. Project ECHO is a validated telementoring model that has been adopted by over 700 organisations globally across multiple sectors. To date there is no consolidated list of success indicators by which organisational teams can assess or benchmark their implementation of Project ECHO across sectors. An e-Delphi methodology was adopted to facilitate a comprehensive means of identifying indicators that could be used to assess the implementations of Project ECHO globally. This paper presents a consolidated framework of indicators that support teams to assess their implementation of Project ECHO. These indicators have been derived by an international panel of experts across the healthcare, education, and university sectors. The final framework identified 54 distinct indicators across four domains: (1) spoke participant engagement, (2) ECHO Hub/teleECHO Network design and operation, (3) ECHO Hub team engagement and (4) Local Impact. This paper highlights that Project ECHO implementation indicators can vary between being dynamic, static, and iterative, depending on the phase of implementation. These findings are significant because they are generalisable to any organisation/sector implementing Project ECHO or similar telementoring models. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-022-00050-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.