ArticleCancer management and research2022
A Tumoral and Peritumoral CT-Based Radiomics and Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Microsatellite Instability of Rectal Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics for predicting microsatellite instability-high status in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative radiomics models using CT and MRI for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of machine learning-based radiomics approach for predicting microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer.La Radiologia medica · 2023Pooled it
- Inclusion of tumor periphery in radiomics analysis of magnetic resonance images does not improve predictions of preoperative therapy response in patients with rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Utilizing intratumoral and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics for predicting KRAS gene mutation status in rectal cancer patients.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Comparison of Intratumoral and Peritumoral Deep Learning, Radiomics, and Fusion Models for Predicting KRAS Gene Mutations in Rectal Cancer Based on Endorectal Ultrasound Imaging.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Non-invasive CT radiomic biomarkers predict microsatellite stability status in colorectal cancer: a multicenter validation study.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Comparison of conventional MRI analysis versus MRI-based radiomics to predict the circumferential margin resection involvement of rectal cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Review
- A radiomics model fusing clinical features to predict microsatellite status preoperatively in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Radiomics from Mesorectal Blood Vessels and Lymph Nodes: A Novel Prognostic Predictor for Rectal Cancer with Neoadjuvant Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Preoperative Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Rectal Cancer Using Five Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Multiparametric MRI Radiomics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics of high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: A narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To predict the status of microsatellite instability (MSI) of rectal carcinoma (RC) using different machine learning algorithms based on tumoral and peritumoral radiomics combined with clinicopathological characteristics. Methods: There were 497 RC patients enrolled in this retrospective study. The tumoral and peritumoral CT-based radiomic features were calculated after tumor segmentation. The radiomic features from two radiologists were compared by way of inter-observer correlation coefficient (ICC). After methods of variance, correlation, and dimension reduction, six machine learning algorithms of logistic regression (LR), Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and decision tree were conducted to develop models for predicting MSI status of RC. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was quantified. The radiomics and significant clinicopathological variables constituted the radiomics-clinicopathological nomogram. The receiver operator curve (ROC) was made by DeLong test, and the area under curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. Results: The venous phase of CT examination was selected for further analysis because the proportion of radiomic features with ICC greater than 0.75 was higher. The tumoral and peritumoral model by LR algorithm (M-LR) with minimal RSD showed good performance in predicting MSI status of RC with the AUCs of 0.817 and 0.726 in the training and validation set. The radiomic-clinicopathological nomogram performed better in both the training and validation set with AUCs of 0.843 and 0.737. Conclusion: The radiomics-clinicopathological nomogram demonstrated better predictive performance in evaluating the MSI status of RC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.