ReviewCureus2022
Why Is There an Increased Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Early Repolarization Syndrome?
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the type 1 pattern: comprehensive risk stratification in Brugada syndrome.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Review
- Cardiac Channelopathies: Clinical Diagnosis and Promising Therapeutics.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last two decades have changed the viewpoint on early repolarization syndrome (ERS). The prevalence of the early repolarization pattern is variable and ranges between 3-24% depending upon age, gender, and criteria used for J-point upliftment from baseline (0.05mV vs. 1 mV). While this pattern was previously linked with a benign result, multiple recent investigations have found a link between early repolarization and Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) by causing life-threatening arrhythmias like Ventricular tachycardia/Ventricular fibrillation, a condition known as early repolarization syndrome. The syndrome falls under a broader bracket of J wave syndromes, which can be caused by early repolarization or depolarization abnormalities. The characteristics of early repolarization that are considered high risk for Sudden Cardiac Death include the amplitude of J-point upliftment from baseline ( > 0.2 mV), Inferior-lateral location of Early Repolarization pattern, and horizontal and downsloping ST-segment. Patients with symptomatic early repolarisation patterns on ECG are more likely to have repeated cardiac episodes. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) implantation and isoproterenol are the recommended treatments in symptomatic patients. On the other hand, asymptomatic patients with early repolarization patterns are prevalent and have a better outcome. Risk categorization is still obscure in asymptomatic early repolarization patterns. This traditional review outlines the known knowledge of pathophysiology behind the increased risk of sudden cardiac death, risk stratification of patients with ERS, and the treatment guidelines for patients with ERS. Further prospective studies are recommended to elucidate the exact mechanism for ventricular arrhythmogenesis in ERS patients and to risk stratifying asymptomatic patients with ERS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.