Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971330›Full record

ArticleNature astronomy2022

Stochastic accretion of the Earth.

Paolo A Sossi, Ingo L Stotz, Seth A Jacobson, Alessandro Morbidelli, Hugh St C O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature astronomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The cosmochemistry of planetary systems.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paolo A SossiInstitute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH Zürich, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ingo L StotzInstitut für Geophysik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Münich, Münich, Germany.
Seth A JacobsonDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Alessandro MorbidelliLaboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Boulevard de l'Observatoire, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France.
Hugh St C O'NeillSchool of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.

Funding

European Research Council 101019380Swiss National Science Foundation 180025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chondritic meteorites are thought to be representative of the material that formed the Earth. However, the Earth is depleted in volatile elements in a manner unlike that in any chondrite, and yet these elements retain chondritic isotope ratios. Here we use N-body simulations to show that the Earth did not form from chondrites, but rather by stochastic accretion of many precursor bodies whose variable compositions reflect the temperatures at which they formed. Earth's composition is reproduced when initial temperatures of planetesimal- to embryo-sized bodies are set by disk accretion rates of (1.08±0.17)×10

Identifiers

PMID35971330
PMCPMC7613298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.