Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971303›Full record

ArticleAnnals of transplantation2022

Evaluation of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the Eurotransplant Senior Program in Comparison to Standard Allocation.

Nelly Delali Eklou, Bernd M Jänigen, Przemyslaw Pisarski, Gerd Walz, Johanna Schneider

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Donor Characteristics Associated With Graft Loss and Delayed Graft Function in Very-Aged Kidney Donors: An Observational Multicentric Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nelly Delali EklouDepartment of Medicine IV, University Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Bernd M JänigenDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Przemyslaw PisarskiDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Gerd WalzDepartment of Medicine IV, University Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Johanna SchneiderDepartment of Medicine IV, University Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The organ shortage and long waiting times have dramatically increased the age of potential kidney transplant recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was initiated to allocate kidneys from deceased donors aged ≥65 years to recipients with a comparable age independent of pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching; however, parameters affecting the long-term benefits of this strategy remain poorly defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated outcome and risk factors for mortality in kidney recipients aged ≥65 years that were transplanted according to the ESP protocol relative to patients aged >50 years transplanted according to the Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS) criteria at the University Freiburg Medical Center, Germany, between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS Graft survival, graft function, the maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, and the incidence of rejections and infections did not differ between groups. Infectious diseases were the main cause of death in both groups; however, infection-associated mortality was more than double in the ESP group, and 5-year patient survival was 61.4% in the ESP group compared to 83.2% in the ETKAS group. Multivariate analysis identified age, the number of HLA mismatches, and the CMV serostatus with a seropositive donor and negative recipient as the main risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS A comparable immunosuppressive regimen used in ESP and ETKAS patients was associated with similar rejection rates and infectious disease complications, and infections were the most common cause of death in both groups. CMV-negative patients receiving an organ from a CMV-positive donor and patients with a high number of HLA mismatches require close follow-up to reduce mortality.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsKidney TransplantationGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35971303
PMCPMC9392420
OpenAlexW4293054271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.