ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2022
Expression of c-Jun and KROX-20 Following Facial Nerve Injury and Recovery in Rats.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of a facial nerve trunk crush injury model and evaluation of facial nerve self-healing in rats.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated whether recovery from facial paralysis was associated with the expression of Krox-20 and c-Jun genes that are shown to be related to facial nerve regeneration after facial nerve compression and cutting.
methodsThe left facial nerves of 24 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 6 weeks were subjected to crushing or cutting injury. Whisker movements of the vibrissae muscle and blink reflexes of the eyelids were measured on days 4 and 14 after facial nerve injury. The facial nerves on both sides were removed, and the expression of c-Jun and Krox-20 proteins was evaluated by Western blotting.
resultsThe level of expression of Krox-20 on day 4 was lower in the crushing group, especially in the cutting group than in the control group (P < .05), but there was no statistically significant difference on day 14 (P > .05). The expression of c-Jun expression was significantly higher in the crushing and cutting groups than in the control group on days 4 and 14 (P < .05).
conclusionThe degree of facial paralysis was more severe and the recovery rate was lower in the cutting group than in the crushing group. The levels of expression of Krox-20 and c-Jun were associated with facial nerve regeneration after facial nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.