Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971130›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Study protocol for a pragmatic cluster RCT on the effect and cost-effectiveness of Everyday Life Rehabilitation versus treatment as usual for persons with severe psychiatric disability living in sheltered or supported housing facilities.

Maria Lindström, Lars Lindholm, Per Liv

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05056415 (Effect and Cost-effectiveness of the 'Everyday Life Rehabilitation' Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05056415 nacompletednot on this map

Effect and Cost-effectiveness of the 'Everyday Life Rehabilitation' Intervention: a Pragmatic RCT of Integrated, Recovery-focused Rehabilitation Within Sheltered and Supported Housing Facilities for People With Psychiatric Disabilities

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled161ConditionsPsychiatric or Mood Diseases or Conditions, Neuropsychiatric Syndrome, Psychosis, AutismArmsEveryday Life Rehabilitation (ELR), Treatment as usual (TAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) for individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria LindströmDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. maria.lindstrom01@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-5314
Lars LindholmDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Per LivDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå university, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SE

Funding

Forte 2021-01391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with severe psychiatric disabilities and impaired autonomy, living in sheltered or supported housing facilities, often lead sedentary, solitary lives indoors and have significantly poorer health than others in the population. Meaningful everyday activities are important for the recovery towards an enrichening, agentic, social, and hopeful everyday life. The Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) model-a person-centred activity- and recovery-oriented intervention-has shown positive outcomes in feasibility studies, and thus a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is required to establish the effectiveness of ELR, along with calculations of cost-effectiveness.

methodsThe ELR-RCT is a pragmatic, two-parallel-armed cluster RCT evaluating the effect and cost-effectiveness of using ELR from two measurement points over 6 months (pre-post intervention) and in three waves over 3 years. The primary outcome is recovering quality of life (ReQoL) at 6 months, and the secondary outcome is self-perceived recovery and daily functioning (RAS-DS) at 6 months. Additionally, Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) will be used for the intervention group. Power analysis has been conducted for primary outcome measure. The first wave will include an internal pilot, to be evaluated after 6 months, used as basis for decisions on updating the required sample size and any other need for adaptations before continuing with the full-scale RCT in the second and third wave. All municipalities within a geographic area in northern Sweden, with a minimum of one sheltered or supported housing facility for people with severe psychiatric or neuropsychiatric disability, including access to occupational therapy, will be enrolled. Participants will be block-randomised to receive ELR plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone for a control period. The control group will thereafter receive delayed ELR. Occupational therapists and housing staff will receive an educational package, manuals, and tools, as well as reflections with colleagues during the intervention period. Housing managers will receive questions for monthly follow-up and coaching with staff. DISCUSSION: This is a protocol for both an internal pilot and full trial of the first RCT study using the ELR intervention model in sheltered or supported housing facilities, evaluating the effects together with cost-effectiveness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05056415. Registered on 24 September 2021.

Indexed as

HousingOccupational TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCollaborationCommunity-based mental healthELR interventionHealth equityOccupational therapyParticipationPerson-centredQuality of lifeRecoverySevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID35971130
PMCPMC9377097
OpenAlexW4291493250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.