Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971111›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Determinants of fertility in Malawi: Does women autonomy dimension matter?

James Forty, Kannan Navaneetham, Gobopamang Letamo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James FortyDepartment of Population Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana. fotejames@gmail.com.
Kannan NavaneethamDepartment of Population Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Gobopamang LetamoDepartment of Population Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
University of Botswana · BW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPower inequality within the household and sexual relationships is linked to poor reproductive health. Malawi Government through National Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights policy is committed to women empowerment as well fertility reduction. However, there is limited evidence in Malawi regarding whether women's autonomy in the household is an independent determinant of fertility. With this background, the aim of this study is to investigate whether women's autonomy in the household is a determinant of fertility in a poor socioeconomic and cultural setting.

methodsThis study used Malawi Demographic and Health Survey, 2015-2016. A multivariable Poisson regression model was used to investigate if women's autonomy in the household in Malawi determines fertility. The outcome measure, children ever born, was used as a measure of fertility. Women's autonomy was measured with two dimensions, such as women's household related decision makings and women's sexual autonomy. The individual recode and household recode were merged for the analysis. The final study sample was 15,952 women who were cohabiting or married at the time of the survey.

resultsThe level of autonomy among women in the household related decisions and sexual autonomy was 49.1% and 64.0% respectively. Controlling for covariates, the study found no significant association between women's autonomy dimensions in the household and number of children ever born. On the other hand, living in urban area (IRR = 0.91, CI 0.88-0.93); having less than tertiary education thus, no education (IRR = 1.83, CI 1.67-1.99) or primary education (IRR = 1.55, CI 1.42-1.69) or secondary education (IRR = 1.23, CI 1.13-1.33); poor households (IRR = 1.05, CI 1.01-1.09), starting cohabiting at the age of 19 years or less (AIRR = 1.15, CI 1.13-1.18) and not using modern contraceptive methods (AIRR = 1.17, CI 1.15-1.19) were significantly associated with fertility. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Though women's autonomy does not have independent effect on fertility, it may be interacting with other sociocultural norms prevailing in the society. The study recommends that the Government of Malawi should come up with economic hardship emancipation policy for poor households. The government should also come up with a girl-child secondary school completion policy. Furthermore, the government should accelerate the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of National Gender Policy to ensure the women empowerment/autonomy is having positive effect at all level including the household.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorFertilityAdultContraceptionDecision MakingFemaleHumansMalawiMarriageSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultFertilityHouseholdMalawiPoissonWomen’s autonomy

Identifiers

PMID35971111
PMCPMC9377123
OpenAlexW4291893119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.