Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971060›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2022

The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study.

Serge J H Heines, Sebastiaan A M de Jongh, Ulrich Strauch, Iwan C C van der Horst, Marcel C G van de Poll, Dennis C J J Bergmans

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Application of electrical impedance tomography in diagnosis and monitoring of pulmonary diseases].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serge J H HeinesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.heines@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7672-4177
Sebastiaan A M de JonghDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9394-2288
Ulrich StrauchDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Iwan C C van der HorstDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3891-8522
Marcel C G van de PollDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3302-4063
Dennis C J J BergmansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-6426
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrical impedance tomography (EIT) visualises alveolar overdistension and alveolar collapse and enables optimisation of ventilator settings by using the best balance between alveolar overdistension and collapse (ODCL). Besides, the global inhomogeneity index (GI), measured by EIT, may also be of added value in determining PEEP. Optimal PEEP is often determined based on the best dynamic compliance without EIT at the bedside. This study aimed to assess the effect of a PEEP trial on ODCL, GI and dynamic compliance in patients with and without ARDS. Secondly, PEEP levels from "optimal PEEP" approaches by ODCL, GI and dynamic compliance are compared.

methodsIn 2015-2016, we included patients with ARDS using postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients as a reference group. A PEEP trial was performed with four consecutive incremental followed by four decremental PEEP steps of 2 cmH

resultsTwenty-eight ARDS and 17 postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients were included. The mean optimal PEEP, according to best compliance, was 10.3 (±2.9) cmH

conclusionsCurrently, no golden standard to titrate PEEP is available. We showed that when using the GI, PEEP requirements are higher compared to ODCL and best dynamic compliance during a PEEP trial in patients with and without ARDS.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeElectric ImpedanceHumansPostoperative PeriodTomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedElectrical impedance tomographyGlobal inhomogeneity indexMechanical ventilationPositive end-expiratory pressureRespiratory system compliance

Identifiers

PMID35971060
PMCPMC9377133
OpenAlexW4291778325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.