Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35971041›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

SCOPE: The South Carolina psycholinguistic metabase.

Chuanji Gao, Svetlana V Shinkareva, Rutvik H Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Incipient Constituents: Phonesthemes Facilitate Word Processing in English.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chuanji GaoDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Svetlana V ShinkarevaDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA. shinkareva@sc.edu.
Rutvik H DesaiDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA. rutvik@sc.edu.

Funding

Semantic SystemsR01DC017162 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DESAI, RUTVIK H · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Conceptual System in the Healthy and Impaired BrainR56DC010783 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DESAI, RUTVIK H · 2018 to 2018
$290k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017162NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC010783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of databases that provide various measurements of lexical properties for psycholinguistic research has increased rapidly in recent years. The proliferation of lexical variables, and the multitude of associated databases, makes the choice, comparison, and standardization of these variables in psycholinguistic research increasingly difficult. Here, we introduce The South Carolina Psycholinguistic Metabase (SCOPE), which is a metabase (or a meta-database) containing an extensive, curated collection of psycholinguistic variable values from major databases. The metabase currently contains 245 lexical variables, organized into seven major categories: General (e.g., frequency), Orthographic (e.g., bigram frequency), Phonological (e.g., phonological uniqueness point), Orth-Phon (e.g., consistency), Semantic (e.g., concreteness), Morphological (e.g., number of morphemes), and Response variables (e.g., lexical decision latency). We hope that SCOPE will become a valuable resource for researchers in psycholinguistics and affiliated disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience of language, computational linguistics, and communication disorders. The availability and ease of use of the metabase with comprehensive set of variables can facilitate the understanding of the unique contribution of each of the variables to word processing, and that of interactions between variables, as well as new insights and development of improved models and theories of word processing. It can also help standardize practice in psycholinguistics. We demonstrate use of the metabase by measuring relationships between variables in multiple ways and testing their individual contribution towards a number of dependent measures, in the most comprehensive analysis of this kind to date. The metabase is freely available at go.sc.edu/scope.

Indexed as

LanguagePsycholinguisticsHumansLinguisticsSemanticsSouth CarolinaDatabaseLexical characteristicsPsycholinguisticWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID35971041
PMCPMC10231664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.