ArticleNature communications2022
Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink.
Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Underestimation of Future Agricultural Soil NGlobal change biology · 2026Article
- Towards Right Answer for the Right Reasons in Global Land Carbon Sink Estimates.Global change biology · 2026Review
- Harmonizing Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Observations Over CONUS NEON Sites: Assessing the Information Contributions of Multiple Data Constraints.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Influence of simulated vs. satellite-based burned areas on modelled terrestrial carbon fluxes.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Amazon forest faces severe decline under the dual pressures of anthropogenic climate change and land-use change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Newly established forests dominated global carbon sequestration change induced by land cover conversions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Estimating forest aboveground carbon sink based on landsat time series and its response to climate change.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The impact of changing forest composition in Europe - longest carbon turnover time in unmanaged and broadleaved deciduous forests.PloS one · 2025Article
- Empirical evidence and theoretical understanding of ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycle interactions.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Widespread influence of artificial light at night on ecosystem metabolism.Nature climate change · 2025Article
- Direct vegetation response to recent CONature communications · 2024Article
- A consistent budgeting of terrestrial carbon fluxes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The enduring world forest carbon sink.Nature · 2024Article
- Regime shift in secondary inorganic aerosol formation and nitrogen deposition in the rural United States.Nature geoscience · 2024Article
- An abrupt shift in gross primary productivity over Eastern China-Mongolia and its inter-model diversity in land surface models.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A theory of demographic optimality in forests.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Quantifying the recarbonization of post-agricultural landscapes.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 17 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The observed global net land carbon sink is captured by current land models. All models agree that atmospheric CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.