Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35970915›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

Whole exome and genome sequencing in mendelian disorders: a diagnostic and health economic analysis.

Lisa J Ewans, Andre E Minoche, Deborah Schofield, Rupendra Shrestha, Clare Puttick, Ying Zhu, Alexander Drew, Velimir Gayevskiy, George Elakis, Corrina Walsh and 25 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Heterogeneity of monogenic epilepsy in loci, phenotypes, and treatment approaches.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Mendelian causes of early-onset emphysema: a review of the current literature.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa J EwansSt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. lisa.ewans@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8419-5666
Andre E MinocheSt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Deborah SchofieldCentre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-494X
Rupendra ShresthaCentre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clare PuttickKinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ying ZhuThe Genetics of Learning Disability Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Alexander DrewKinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5701-0654
Velimir GayevskiyKinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
George ElakisRandwick Genomics Laboratory, NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Corrina WalshRandwick Genomics Laboratory, NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lesley C AdèsDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alison ColleyClinical Genetics Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Carolyn EllawayCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Carey-Anne EvansRandwick Genomics Laboratory, NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mary-Louise FreckmannClinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Linda GoodwinGenetics Services, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anna HackettThe Genetics of Learning Disability Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Benjamin KamienHunter Genetics, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Edwin P KirkCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4662-0024
Michelle LipkeCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David MowatCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth PalmerCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-215X
Sulekha RajagopalanClinical Genetics Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5559-9466
Anne RonanHunter Genetics, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5799-0293
Rani SachdevCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
William StevensonNorthern Blood Research Centre, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anne TurnerCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Meredith WilsonDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-2033
Lisa WorganClinical Genetics Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marie-Christine Morel-KoppNorthern Blood Research Centre, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael FieldThe Genetics of Learning Disability Service, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7455-934X
Michael F BuckleyRandwick Genomics Laboratory, NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark J CowleySt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9519-5714
Marcel E Dinger *Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia. m.dinger@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-934X
Tony Roscioli *Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. tony.roscioli@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-5000
Garvan Institute of Medical Research · AUUNSW Sydney · AUHunter Genetics · AUThe University of Sydney · AULiverpool Hospital · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUMacquarie University · AUNepean Hospital · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AUSydney Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) improves Mendelian disorder diagnosis over whole exome sequencing (WES); however, additional diagnostic yields and costs remain undefined. We investigated differences between diagnostic and cost outcomes of WGS and WES in a cohort with suspected Mendelian disorders. WGS was performed in 38 WES-negative families derived from a 64 family Mendelian cohort that previously underwent WES. For new WGS diagnoses, contemporary WES reanalysis determined whether variants were diagnosable by original WES or unique to WGS. Diagnostic rates were estimated for WES and WGS to simulate outcomes if both had been applied to the 64 families. Diagnostic costs were calculated for various genomic testing scenarios. WGS diagnosed 34% (13/38) of WES-negative families. However, contemporary WES reanalysis on average 2 years later would have diagnosed 18% (7/38 families) resulting in a WGS-specific diagnostic yield of 19% (6/31 remaining families). In WES-negative families, the incremental cost per additional diagnosis using WGS following WES reanalysis was AU$36,710 (£19,407;US$23,727) and WGS alone was AU$41,916 (£22,159;US$27,093) compared to WES-reanalysis. When we simulated the use of WGS alone as an initial genomic test, the incremental cost for each additional diagnosis was AU$29,708 (£15,705;US$19,201) whereas contemporary WES followed by WGS was AU$36,710 (£19,407;US$23,727) compared to contemporary WES. Our findings confirm that WGS is the optimal genomic test choice for maximal diagnosis in Mendelian disorders. However, accepting a small reduction in diagnostic yield, WES with subsequent reanalysis confers the lowest costs. Whether WES or WGS is utilised will depend on clinical scenario and local resourcing and availability.

Indexed as

ExomeBase SequenceChromosome MappingExome SequencingHumansWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35970915
PMCPMC9553973
OpenAlexW4291383291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.