Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35970824›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Generalisable 3D printing error detection and correction via multi-head neural networks.

Douglas A J Brion, Sebastian W Pattinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Continuous Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Online Measurement for Parameter Discovery in Fused Filament Fabrication.Integrating materials and manufacturing innovation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas A J BrionDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK. dajb3@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5361-2882
Sebastian W PattinsonDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK. swp29@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7851-7718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Material extrusion is the most widespread additive manufacturing method but its application in end-use products is limited by vulnerability to errors. Humans can detect errors but cannot provide continuous monitoring or real-time correction. Existing automated approaches are not generalisable across different parts, materials, and printing systems. We train a multi-head neural network using images automatically labelled by deviation from optimal printing parameters. The automation of data acquisition and labelling allows the generation of a large and varied extrusion 3D printing dataset, containing 1.2 million images from 192 different parts labelled with printing parameters. The thus trained neural network, alongside a control loop, enables real-time detection and rapid correction of diverse errors that is effective across many different 2D and 3D geometries, materials, printers, toolpaths, and even extrusion methods. We additionally create visualisations of the network's predictions to shed light on how it makes decisions.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPrinting, Three-DimensionalHumans

Identifiers

PMID35970824
PMCPMC9378646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.