ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022
Non-Neural Factors Influencing BOLD Response Magnitudes within Individual Subjects.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping human visual contrast sensitivity and vision loss across the visual field with model-based fMRI.eLife · 2026Article
- Simultaneous mesoscopic imaging of neural activity and hemodynamics reveals anesthetic modulation of neurovascular responses.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Revisiting the auditory hemodynamic response function in the era of fast fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Resting-State vs. Task-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neurosurgical Planning: A Narrative Review of Clinical Applications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Development of a 24-channel 3T phased-array coil for fMRI in awake monkeys: Mitigating spatiotemporal artifacts in ferumoxytol-weighted functional connectivity estimation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Human V4 size predicts crowding distance.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Principles of intensive human neuroimaging.Trends in neurosciences · 2024Article
- Cerebral hyperactivation across the Alzheimer's disease pathological cascade.Brain communications · 2024Review
- Article
- The Bouma law accounts for crowding in 50 observers.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Polar angle asymmetries in visual perception and neural architecture.Trends in neurosciences · 2023Review
- Comparing retinotopic maps of children and adults reveals a late-stage change in how V1 samples the visual field.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Dissociation between phase and power correlation networks in the human brain is driven by co-occurrent bursts.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To what extent is the size of the BOLD response influenced by factors other than neural activity? In a reanalysis of three neuroimaging datasets (male and female human participants), we find large systematic inhomogeneities in the BOLD response magnitude in primary visual cortex (V1): stimulus-evoked BOLD responses, expressed in units of percent signal change, are up to 50% larger along the representation of the horizontal meridian than the vertical meridian. To assess whether this surprising effect can be interpreted as differences in local neural activity, we quantified several factors that potentially contribute to the size of the BOLD response. We find relationships between BOLD response magnitude and cortical thickness, curvature, depth, and macrovasculature. These relationships are consistently found across subjects and datasets and suggest that variation in BOLD response magnitudes across cortical locations reflects, in part, differences in anatomy and vascularization. To compensate for these factors, we implement a regression-based correction method and show that, after correction, BOLD responses become more homogeneous across V1. The correction reduces the horizontal/vertical difference by about half, indicating that some of the difference is likely not because of neural activity differences. We conclude that interpretation of variation in BOLD response magnitude across cortical locations should consider the influence of the potential confounding factors of thickness, curvature, depth, and vascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.