Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35970558›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Non-Neural Factors Influencing BOLD Response Magnitudes within Individual Subjects.

Jan W Kurzawski, Omer Faruk Gulban, Keith Jamison, Jonathan Winawer, Kendrick Kay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human V4 size predicts crowding distance.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  8. Principles of intensive human neuroimaging.Trends in neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan W KurzawskiDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003 jan.kurzawski@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-1236
Omer Faruk GulbanCognitive Neuroscience Department, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 62229, The Netherlands.
Keith JamisonDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021.
Jonathan WinawerDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7475-5586
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.

Funding

Development and validation of empirical models of the neuronal population activity underlying non-invasive human brain measurementsR01MH111417 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT · PI DEVINSKY, ORRIN, DIJKHUIZEN, RICK M · 2016 to 2020
$4.4M
Linking brain and behavior 'around' the visual fieldR01EY027401 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA, WINAWER, JONATHAN A · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
Studying crowding as a window into object recognition and development and health of visual cortexR01EY027964 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PELLI, DENIS G · 2018 to 2020
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027401NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027964NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To what extent is the size of the BOLD response influenced by factors other than neural activity? In a reanalysis of three neuroimaging datasets (male and female human participants), we find large systematic inhomogeneities in the BOLD response magnitude in primary visual cortex (V1): stimulus-evoked BOLD responses, expressed in units of percent signal change, are up to 50% larger along the representation of the horizontal meridian than the vertical meridian. To assess whether this surprising effect can be interpreted as differences in local neural activity, we quantified several factors that potentially contribute to the size of the BOLD response. We find relationships between BOLD response magnitude and cortical thickness, curvature, depth, and macrovasculature. These relationships are consistently found across subjects and datasets and suggest that variation in BOLD response magnitudes across cortical locations reflects, in part, differences in anatomy and vascularization. To compensate for these factors, we implement a regression-based correction method and show that, after correction, BOLD responses become more homogeneous across V1. The correction reduces the horizontal/vertical difference by about half, indicating that some of the difference is likely not because of neural activity differences. We conclude that interpretation of variation in BOLD response magnitude across cortical locations should consider the influence of the potential confounding factors of thickness, curvature, depth, and vascularization.

Indexed as

BOLD signalfMRImeridianvasculature

Identifiers

PMID35970558
PMCPMC9512576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.