Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35970458›Full record

ReviewThe Science of the total environment2022

Oxidation and fragmentation of plastics in a changing environment; from UV-radiation to biological degradation.

A L Andrady, P W Barnes, J F Bornman, T Gouin, S Madronich, C C White, R G Zepp, M A K Jansen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 347 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

A L AndradyChemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
P W BarnesBiological Sciences and Environmental Program, Loyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA.
J F BornmanFood Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
T GouinTG Environmental Research, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, UK.
S MadronichAtmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
C C WhiteExponent, Inc, Bowie, MD 20715, USA.
R G ZeppORD/CEMM, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, USA.
M A K JansenSchool of BEES, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: m.jansen@ucc.ie.
Environmental Protection Agency · USExponent (United States) · USLoyola University New Orleans · USMurdoch University · AUNorth Carolina State University · USNSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · USUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Bedfordshire · GB

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the fate of plastics in the environment is of critical importance for the quantitative assessment of the biological impacts of plastic waste. Specially, there is a need to analyze in more detail the reputed longevity of plastics in the context of plastic degradation through oxidation and fragmentation reactions. Photo-oxidation of plastic debris by solar UV radiation (UVR) makes material prone to subsequent fragmentation. The fragments generated following oxidation and subsequent exposure to mechanical stresses include secondary micro- or nanoparticles, an emerging class of pollutants. The paper discusses the UV-driven photo-oxidation process, identifying relevant knowledge gaps and uncertainties. Serious gaps in knowledge exist concerning the wavelength sensitivity and the dose-response of the photo-fragmentation process. Given the heterogeneity of natural UV irradiance varying from no exposure in sediments to full UV exposure of floating, beach litter or air-borne plastics, it is argued that the rates of UV-driven degradation/fragmentation will also vary dramatically between different locations and environmental niches. Biological phenomena such as biofouling will further modulate the exposure of plastics to UV radiation, while potentially also contributing to degradation and/or fragmentation of plastics independent of solar UVR. Reductions in solar UVR in many regions, consequent to the implementation of the Montreal Protocol and its Amendments for protecting stratospheric ozone, will have consequences for global UV-driven plastic degradation in a heterogeneous manner across different geographic and environmental zones. The interacting effects of global warming, stratospheric ozone and UV radiation are projected to increase UV irradiance at the surface in localized areas, mainly because of decreased cloud cover. Given the complexity and uncertainty of future environmental conditions, this currently precludes reliable quantitative predictions of plastic persistence on a global scale.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsStratospheric OzoneGlobal WarmingPlasticsUltraviolet RaysEnvironmental PollutantsPlasticsStratospheric OzoneEnvironmental persistenceFragmentationPhoto-oxidationPlasticUV radiation

Identifiers

PMID35970458
PMCPMC9765214
OpenAlexW4290830217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.