SynthesisJournal of affective disorders2022
Online psychosocial interventions for improving mental health in people during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of digital interventions on relationship satisfaction among couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of psychosocial interventions to reduce affective symptoms in sexual and gender minorities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Enhancing the psychological well-being and sleep quality of healthcare providers with a multimodal psychological support program: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- The feasibility and acceptability of mood on track: an online psychological intervention for bipolar disorder.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- Effects of COVID-19 e-mental health interventions: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Internet interventions · 2025Article
- Associations between mental health and lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in a general Japanese population: NIPPON DATA2010.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Quarantine Experience-Based Differences in Factors Associated with Depression Among Koreans During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Use of Social Media to Express and Manage Medical Uncertainty in Dyskeratosis Congenita: Content Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a CBT-Based Program for Mental Health in the General Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Stepped-Care Approach Using a Chatbot and Digitized Group Intervention.Depression and anxiety · 2024Article
- Process evaluation of PsyCovidApp, a digital tool for mobile devices aimed at protecting the mental health of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed method study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Internet-based self-administered intervention to reduce anxiety and depression symptomatology and improve well-being in 7 countries: protocol of a randomized control trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Mental Health Impacts of a Pandemic: A Multiaxial Conceptual Model for COVID-19.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A co-produced service evaluation of ethnic minority community service user experiences of a specialist mental health service during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Sleep Disturbance and Immunological Consequences of COVID-19.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Review
- COVID-19-related mental health difficulties among marginalised populations: A literature review.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- Anxiety, depression, psychological stress and coping style in medical postgraduates in southeastern China when restricted to commuting between the campus and hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Adapting Cognitive Remediation Group Therapy Online: Focus Groups with People Aging with HIV.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, interventions for public mental health were mostly delivered through online modalities. Although many studies have explored the effectiveness of online psychosocial interventions through randomized controlled trials, there is a lack of quantitative synthesis of the effectiveness of online psychosocial interventions and an examination of their overall application.
objectiveTo understand the commonly used psychosocial interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the effectiveness of the interventions.
methodsRisk bias was assessed in the included studies according to the Cochrane Collaboration criteria, and data from post-test and follow-up were combined for standardized mean differences using Stata 16.0 software, and sources of heterogeneity were explored by subgroup analysis, and risk bias was assessed in the included studies using Review Manager 5.4 software. The study was written in strict accordance with PRISMA specifications, and registration was completed on the PROSPERO platform (CRD42022302917).
resultsThe online psychosocial intervention had an ameliorating effect on anxiety (SMD = -0.78), depression (SMD = -0.80), and insomnia (SMD = -0.19) in the public during the COVID-19 pandemic, was ineffective for the intervention on stress, and the effectiveness of the intervention on depression continued at follow-up. Subgroup analyses showed that the type of intervention, intervention form, Duration of intervention, and setting of the control group influenced the trial results to some extent, with cognitive behavioral therapy being the most effective intervention for anxiety and depressive symptoms, self-help interventions being more effective than interventions with therapist interventions, and 1-4 week interventions being more effective than 5-8 week interventions. Due to the limited number of studies included in the analysis and variability in quality, more randomized controlled trials are needed to test the findings.
conclusionOnline psychosocial interventions can be effective in improving symptoms of anxiety, depression, stress, and insomnia in the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, additional randomized controlled trial studies are needed to determine which types of interventions are more appropriate for which populations and how they can be implemented to achieve better intervention outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.