ArticleEndoscopy2023
A feasibility study comparing gel immersion endoscopic resection and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.
Article in Endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gel Immersion Improves Visualization in Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Prospective Crossover Trial.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Trial
- Article
- Article
- Efficacy of gel immersion endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Gel Immersion Tumor Characterization for Colorectal Lesions: A Pilot Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Gel immersion in endoscopy: Exploring potential applications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.Gut and liver · 2025Review
- Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection of a duodenal adenoma with gastric phenotype.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Bowel Tumor.Cancers · 2024Review
- Gel immersion endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric neoplasms: a multicenter case series study.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Endoscopic resection combined with gel immersion and curved laryngoscope for superficial hypopharyngeal cancer.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Gel Immersion Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough gel immersion endoscopic resection (GIER) is a potential alternative to underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs), comparisons between the two are currently insufficient.
methods40 consecutive procedures performed in 35 patients were retrospectively reviewed; the primary outcome was procedure time, and the secondary outcomes were en bloc and R0 resection rates, tumor and specimen size, and adverse events.
resultsLesions were divided into GIER (n = 22) and UEMR groups (n = 18). The median (range) procedure time was significantly shorter in the GIER group than in the UEMR group (2.75 [1-3.5] minutes vs. 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 minutes;
conclusionsGIER is efficacious and safe to treat SNADETs, although additional studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.