Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969833›Full record

ArticleUrology practice2021

Primary Care Physician Perspectives on Low Risk Prostate Cancer Management: Results of a National Survey.

Archana Radhakrishnan, Lauren P Wallner, Ted A Skolarus, Vahakn B Shahinian, Paul H Abrahamse, Michael D Fetters, Sarah T Hawley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Archana RadhakrishnanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lauren P WallnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ted A SkolarusDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Vahakn B ShahinianDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Paul H AbrahamseDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-7433-153X
Michael D FettersDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-8521-5681
Sarah T HawleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Engaging PCPs to optimize active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancerK08CA245237 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RADHAKRISHNAN, ARCHANA · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA245237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Primary care providers can collaborate with urologists to ensure men with low risk prostate cancer on active surveillance receive followup testing and adhere to the management strategy, yet primary care provider attitudes about active surveillance and their roles remain unknown. Methods: We surveyed 1,000 primary care providers (347/741 eligible primary care providers responded). We assessed primary care provider support for and beliefs about active surveillance, and attitudes about and preferences for their role in various aspects of low risk prostate cancer management. We then examined associations between 1) primary care provider support for and primary care provider beliefs about active surveillance; and 2) primary care provider attitudes and preferences for their role. Results: Nearly 50% of primary care providers strongly supported active surveillance for all low risk men, and 81% strongly agreed that active surveillance allows men to avoid side effects, while 57% strongly agreed it caused worry. Primary care providers who strongly supported active surveillance were less likely to strongly agree that active surveillance contributes to worry (50.3% vs 63.7% respectively, p=0.01). Half of the primary care providers strongly agreed that primary care providers can provide cancer-related care (50.5%), and the majority preferred a shared care model to ordering prostate specific antigen tests (60.1%). Primary care providers who strongly agreed that primary care providers can provide cancer-related care were more likely to prefer a primary care provider-led (79.3% vs 20.7%) or shared care (53.9% vs 46.1%) model vs urologist-led for ordering prostate specific antigen tests (p <0.01). Conclusions: While many primary care providers supported active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer, primary care providers still had concerns with it as the primary management strategy. Understanding primary care providers perspectives on low risk prostate cancer management can inform strategies to improve high quality active surveillance care.

Indexed as

attitudephysicians, primary careprostatic neoplasmsurologistswatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID35969833
PMCPMC9365261
OpenAlexW3162036008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.