Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969815›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2022

Backgrounds and Trainings in Cannabis Therapeutics of Dispensary Personnel.

Ilana M Braun, Manan M Nayak, Jane E Roberts, Peter R Chai, James A Tulsky, Donald I Abrams, William Pirl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advising Around Cannabis for Sleep: Clearing Up the Smoke.Current research in complementary & alternative medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Cannabis use among recently treated cancer patients: perceptions and experiences.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilana M BraunHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-3532-7057
Manan M NayakHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-4979-8343
Jane E RobertsHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Peter R ChaiHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
James A TulskyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-0453
Donald I AbramsDepartment of Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
William PirlHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5226-9886

Funding

Smart Steps: A context-aware adherence intervention to improve PrEP adherence among men who have sex with men (MSM) with substance use disorderDP2DA056107 · NIDA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHAI, PETER R · 2022 to 2022
$2.7M
Development of Ingestible Biosensors to Enhance PrEP Adherence in Substance UsersK23DA044874 · NIDA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHAI, PETER R · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA056107NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA044874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA growing body of scientific research indicates that oncology teams tend to offer individuals with cancer little clinical advice regarding medicinal cannabis (MC) and that individuals with cancer instead turn to cannabis dispensaries for MC guidance. Our objective was to investigate dispensary personnel's backgrounds and trainings in MC advising.

methodsThe study design was semistructured interviews across 13 states with cannabis dispensary personnel in managerial or client-facing positions. Of 38 recruited, 26 (68%) completed interview. The primary outcome was training in MC advising. Researchers targeted thematic saturation and adhered to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.

resultsOf 26 participants, 54% were female, with an average age of 40 (range: 22-64) years. Half worked in client-facing roles; half worked in managerial ones. Study participants endorsed passionate commitment to their profession, often motivated by personal experience with MC therapeutics. Cannabis dispensaries often privileged sales skills over cannabis therapeutics knowledge when hiring, resulting in uneven baseline levels of cannabis therapeutics expertise among staff. Most participants reported workplace cannabis therapeutics training to be unstandardized and weak. They described dispensary personnel as resourceful in pursuing cannabis knowledge, self-financing learning in off-hours, sampling dispensary products, and exchanging knowledge. Nearly half the participants called for quality, standardized cannabis therapeutics training for dispensary personnel.

conclusionThe many oncology teams who defer to dispensary personnel regarding MC advising rely on a workforce who views themselves as unevenly trained. Further research should include a national survey of cannabis dispensary personnel to learn whether these findings hold true in a larger sample. If so, the oncology community must determine the best approach to clinically advising individuals with cancer about MC.

Indexed as

CannabisMedical MarijuanaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMedical Marijuana

Identifiers

PMID35969815
PMCPMC9653199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.