ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022
The Threatened Species Imperative: Conservation assessments would benefit from population genomic insights.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomics identifies koala populations at risk across eastern Australia.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Genomic Diversity as a Key Conservation Criterion: Proof-of-Concept From Mammalian Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Conserving a threatened North American walnut: a chromosome-scale reference genome for butternut (Juglans cinerea).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- A Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Annotation for the Clouded Apollo Butterfly (Parnassius mnemosyne): A Species of Global Conservation Concern.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Functional genomic diversity is correlated with neutral genomic diversity in populations of an endangered rattlesnake.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Reply to DeWoody et al.: Inequitable access to affordable sequencing limits the benefits from population genomic insights.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.