Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969790›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Deep learning predicts DNA methylation regulatory variants in the human brain and elucidates the genetics of psychiatric disorders.

Jiyun Zhou, Qiang Chen, Patricia R Braun, Kira A Perzel Mandell, Andrew E Jaffe, Hao Yang Tan, Thomas M Hyde, Joel E Kleinman, James B Potash, Gen Shinozaki and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiyun ZhouLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Qiang ChenLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.ORCID 0000-0003-0373-4459
Patricia R BraunDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Kira A Perzel MandellLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Andrew E JaffeLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Hao Yang TanLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.ORCID 0000-0003-3561-2093
Thomas M HydeLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.ORCID 0000-0002-8746-3037
Joel E KleinmanLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-6052
James B PotashDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Gen ShinozakiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305.
Daniel R WeinbergerLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.ORCID 0000-0003-2409-2969
Shizhong HanLieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Johns Hopkins University · USLieber Institute for Brain Development · USStanford University · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM008629 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI EBERL, DANIEL F · 1997 to 2021
$4.1M
Functional methylomics approaches for schizophrenia in the frontal cortex and hippocampusR01MH112751 · NIMH · LIEBER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI HAN, SHIZHONG · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Identification of Epigenetics Correlates between Brain and Peripheral TissuesR01MH119165 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SHINOZAKI, GEN · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
Integrative approaches to identification and interpretation of genes underlying psychiatric disordersR01MH121394 · NIMH · LIEBER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI HAN, SHIZHONG · 2020 to 2023
$2.4M
A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO THE GENETIC STUDY OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCER01AA024486 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HAN, SHIZHONG, TAN, KAI · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024486NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008629NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112751NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119165NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence for the role of DNA methylation (DNAm) quantitative trait loci (mQTLs) in the genetics of complex traits, including psychiatric disorders. However, due to extensive linkage disequilibrium (LD) of the genome, it is challenging to identify causal genetic variations that drive DNAm levels by population-based genetic association studies. This limits the utility of mQTLs for fine-mapping risk loci underlying psychiatric disorders identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here we present INTERACT, a deep learning model that integrates convolutional neural networks with transformer, to predict effects of genetic variations on DNAm levels at CpG sites in the human brain. We show that INTERACT-derived DNAm regulatory variants are not confounded by LD, are concentrated in regulatory genomic regions in the human brain, and are convergent with mQTL evidence from genetic association analysis. We further demonstrate that predicted DNAm regulatory variants are enriched for heritability of brain-related traits and improve polygenic risk prediction for schizophrenia across diverse ancestry samples. Finally, we applied predicted DNAm regulatory variants for fine-mapping schizophrenia GWAS risk loci to identify potential novel risk genes. Our study shows the power of a deep learning approach to identify functional regulatory variants that may elucidate the genetic basis of complex traits.

Indexed as

Brain ChemistryDeep LearningDNA MethylationSchizophreniaBrainCpG IslandsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Lociconvolutional neural network (CNN)DNA methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTL)GWASregulatory variantstransformer

Identifiers

PMID35969790
PMCPMC9407663
OpenAlexW4291652457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.