Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969784›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Two interaction surfaces between XPA and RPA organize the preincision complex in nucleotide excision repair.

Mihyun Kim, Hyun-Suk Kim, Areetha D'Souza, Kaitlyn Gallagher, Eunwoo Jeong, Agnieszka Topolska-Wós, Kateryna Ogorodnik Le Meur, Chi-Lin Tsai, Miaw-Sheue Tsai, Minyong Kee and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DNA Repair Mechanisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mihyun KimCenter for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8347-103X
Hyun-Suk KimCenter for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.
Areetha D'SouzaDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-7917.
Kaitlyn GallagherDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-7917.
Eunwoo JeongCenter for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7323-1518
Agnieszka Topolska-WósDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-7917.
Kateryna Ogorodnik Le MeurDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-7917.
Chi-Lin TsaiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.ORCID 0000-0002-0365-2405
Miaw-Sheue TsaiBiological and Systems Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Minyong KeeCenter for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.
John A TainerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.ORCID 0000-0003-1659-2429
Jung-Eun YeoCenter for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.
Walter J ChazinDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-7917.ORCID 0000-0002-2180-0790
Orlando D SchärerCenter for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2425-2715
Vanderbilt University · USInstitute for Basic Science · KRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

Transcription-Coupled & Replication-Associated Excision RepairP01CA092584 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI WALTER J. CHAZIN · 2001 to 2026
$89.6M
User Training and OutreachP30GM124169 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI PAUL David ADAMS, Gregory L Hura · 2017 to 2026
$28.6M
The XPA scaffold protein in Nucleotide Excision RepairR01CA218315 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER J. CHAZIN · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
A Pixel Array Detector System for Small Angle X-ray ScatteringS10OD018483 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CLASSEN, SCOTT · 2014 to 2014
$998k
NanoTemper Monolith NT.115 Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) instrumentS10OD021483 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SPILLER, BENJAMIN W · 2016 to 2016
$136k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA092584NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218315NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM124169NIH HHS S10 OD018483NIH HHS S10 OD021483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The xeroderma pigmentosum protein A (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA) proteins fulfill essential roles in the assembly of the preincision complex in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. We have previously characterized the two interaction sites, one between the XPA N-terminal (XPA-N) disordered domain and the RPA32 C-terminal domain (RPA32C), and the other with the XPA DNA binding domain (DBD) and the RPA70AB DBDs. Here, we show that XPA mutations that inhibit the physical interaction in either site reduce NER activity in biochemical and cellular systems. Combining mutations in the two sites leads to an additive inhibition of NER, implying that they fulfill distinct roles. Our data suggest a model in which the interaction between XPA-N and RPA32C is important for the initial association of XPA with NER complexes, while the interaction between XPA DBD and RPA70AB is needed for structural organization of the complex to license the dual incision reaction. Integrative structural models of complexes of XPA and RPA bound to single-stranded/double-stranded DNA (ss/dsDNA) junction substrates that mimic the NER bubble reveal key features of the architecture of XPA and RPA in the preincision complex. Most critical among these is that the shape of the NER bubble is far from colinear as depicted in current models, but rather the two strands of unwound DNA must assume a U-shape with the two ss/dsDNA junctions localized in close proximity. Our data suggest that the interaction between XPA and RPA70 is key for the organization of the NER preincision complex.

Indexed as

DNA RepairReplication Protein AXeroderma Pigmentosum Group A ProteinDNADNA DamageProtein BindingProtein DomainsDNAReplication Protein AXeroderma Pigmentosum Group A ProteinDNA repairnucleotide excision repairreplication protein Axeroderma pigmentosum protein A

Identifiers

PMID35969784
PMCPMC9407234
OpenAlexW4291652370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.