Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969713›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2022

Effects of various cooling methods and drinking water temperatures on reproductive performance and behavior in heat stressed sows.

Habeeb Tajudeen, Joseph Moturi, Abdolreza Hosseindoust, SangHun Ha, JunYoung Mun, YoHan Choi, SooJin Sa, JinSoo Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of dietary yeast β-glucan on lactating sows under heat stress.Journal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Habeeb TajudeenDepartment of Bio-Health Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-3175
Joseph MoturiDepartment of Bio-Health Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-0255
Abdolreza HosseindoustDepartment of Bio-Health Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-0613
SangHun HaDepartment of Bio-Health Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-1144
JunYoung MunDepartment of Bio-Health Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-7157
YoHan ChoiSwine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-4731
SooJin SaSwine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2634-5109
JinSoo KimDepartment of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-7917
Kangwon National University · KRRural Development Administration · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of multiple cooling systems and different drinking water temperatures (DWT) on the performance of sows and their hair cortisol levels during heat stress. In this study, the effect of four different cooling systems: air conditioner (AC), cooling pad (CP), snout cooling (SC), and mist spray (MS), and two DWT, namely low water temperature (LWT) and high water temperature (HWT) on 48 multiparous sows (Landrace × Yorkshire; 242.84 ± 2.89 kg) was tested. The experiment is based on the use of eight replicas during a 21-days test. Different behaviors were recorded under different cooling treatments in sows. As a result, behaviors such as drinking, standing, and position change were found to be lower in sows under the AC and CP treatments than in those under the SC and MS treatments. Lying behavior increased under the AC and CP systems as compared with that under the SC and MS, systems. The average daily feed intake (ADFI) in sows and weight at weaning in piglets was higher under the AC, CP, and LWT treatments than under the SC, MS and HWT treatments. Sows subjected to SC and MS treatment showed higher hair cortisol levels, rectal temperature, and respiratory rate during lactation than those under AC and CP treatments. Hair cortisol levels, rectal temperature, and respiratory rate were also higher under the HWT than under the LWT treatment. As per the results of this study, the LWT has no significant effect on any of the behavioral factors. Taken together, the use of AC and CP cooling treatment is highly recommended to improve the behavior and to reduce the stress levels in lactating sows.

Indexed as

Cooling systemCortisolLactationPigletsTemperature-humidity indexWater temperature

Identifiers

PMID35969713
PMCPMC9353355
OpenAlexW4280507743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.