Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969702›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2022

Protective effects of biological feed additives on gut microbiota and the health of pigs exposed to deoxynivalenol: a review.

Neeraja Recharla, Sungkwon Park, Minji Kim, Byeonghyeon Kim, Jin Young Jeong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Porcine intestinal goblet cells: Guardians of mucosal immunity and barrier function.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neeraja RecharlaDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-7436
Sungkwon ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-9719
Minji KimAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-1921
Byeonghyeon KimAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4651-6857
Jin Young JeongAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-7036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deoxynivalenol (DON) is the most common mycotoxin contaminant of cereal-based food and animal feed. The toxicity of DON is very low compared to that of other toxins; however, the most prominent signs of DON exposure include inappetence and body weight loss, which causes considerable economic losses in the livestock industry. This review summarizes critical studies on biological DON mycotoxin mitigation strategies and the respective

Indexed as

Biological feed additivesDeoxynivalenolGut healthMycotoxinsPigs

Identifiers

PMID35969702
PMCPMC9353346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.