Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969415›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2022

Promoting nurses' and midwives' ethical responsibilities towards vulnerable people: An alignment of research and clinical practice.

Adele Baldwin, Tanya Capper, Clare Harvey, Eileen Willis, Bridget Ferguson, Natalie Browning

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adele BaldwinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-4142
Tanya CapperSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-1423
Clare HarveySchool of Nursing, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-8840
Eileen WillisFlinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7576-971X
Bridget FergusonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-3609
Natalie BrowningSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Central Queensland University · AUFlinders University · AUMassey University · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo stimulate discussion and debate about the inclusion of vulnerable populations in primary research to inform practice change and improve health outcomes.

backgroundCurrent research practices to safeguard vulnerable people from potential harms related to power imbalances may in fact limit the generation of evidence-based practice. EVALUATION: The authors draw on their experience working and researching with a recognized group of vulnerable people, incarcerated pregnant women, to provide insight into the application of ethics in both research and clinical practice. In a novel approach, the ethical principles are presented in both contexts, articulating the synergies between them. Suggestions are presented for how individuals, managers and organizations may improve research opportunities for clinical practitioners and enhance the engagement of vulnerable people to contribute to meaningful practice and policy change. KEY ISSUES: Ethical practice guidelines may limit the ability to create meaningful change for vulnerable populations, who need authentic system change to achieve good health outcomes.

conclusionInclusive research and practice are essential to ensuring a strengths-based approach to healthcare and addressing health needs of the whole population. Health systems and models of care recognizing the diverse lives and health needs of the broader population demand practical, sustainable support from clinical managers. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Practical suggestions for clinical managers to support point of care research is provided, embedding vulnerable voices in policy, practice development and care provision.

Indexed as

MidwiferyNursesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansPregnancycase studyethical nursing practiceresearch ethicsvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID35969415
PMCPMC10087887
OpenAlexW4291583258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.