ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Corpus Callosum Development With Fetal Growth Restriction and Maternal Preeclampsia or Gestational Hypertension.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fetal brain development in fetal growth restriction using MRI: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Multi-Organ Phenotypes of Offspring Born Following Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Fetal neurosonographic assessment of cortical development in late-onset Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age fetuses.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Article
- The impact and mechanisms of preeclampsia on offspring neurodevelopment.Cell & bioscience · 2026Review
- The influence of early nutrition intake and clinical factors on the brain development of preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Investigation of potential protein biomarkers for the screening of placental-mediated fetal growth restriction disorders using targeted proteomics Olink technology.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Early Fetal Growth Restriction with or Without Hypertensive Disorders: a Clinical Overview.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Review
- Structural brain correlates of non-verbal cognitive ability in 5-year-old children: Findings from the FinnBrain birth cohort study.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Correlation of abnormal brain changes with perinatal factors in very preterm infants based on diffusion tensor imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: It remains unknown whether neurodevelopmental impairments are directly associated with the structural development of the brain in offspring with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and mothers with preeclampsia (PE) or gestational hypertension (GH). Objectives: To assess whether fetal corpus callosum (CC) development differed among pregnancies with PE or GH with FGR, pregnancies with PE or GH without FGR, and normotensive pregnancies, particularly the severity of maternal disease and FGR, and to identify the association between adverse perinatal outcomes and structural development of the CC in fetuses with FGR in pregnancies with PE or GH. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective matched case-control study was conducted between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2021, at Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine in Hangzhou, China. The participant group included cases of singleton pregnancies with PE or GH with FGR; the control groups included cases with PG or GH without FGR and cases with paired normotensive pregnancy. Exposures: Maternal PE or GH and FGR. Main Outcomes and Measures: The length, thickness, total area, subdivision areas, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of fetal CC were measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analyzed. The association between adverse perinatal outcomes and structural development of CC was further investigated. Results: A total of 56 pregnant individuals with singleton pregnancies and PE or GH and fetuses with FGR were enrolled (maternal median [IQR] age, 29.0 [26.0-34.0] years; mean [SD] gestational age at MRI, 33.6 [2.5] weeks). Significant patterns of decreased median (IQR) fetal CC length (0.4284 [0.4079-0.4470] mm vs 0.4614 [0.4461-0.4944] mm, P < .001, vs 0.4591 [0.4310-0.4927] mm, P < .001) and mean (SD) CC total area (1.0779 [0.1931] mm2 vs 1.1896 [0.1803] mm2, P = .001, vs 1.1438 [0.1935] mm2, P = .02), adjusted for the cephalic index, was observed in cases of PE or GH with FGR compared with cases without FGR and cases with normotensive pregnancy. The splenium region of fetal CC also exhibited the distinct alterations in macrostructural development (with FGR: 0.3149 [0.0697] mm2 vs without FGR: 0.3727 [0.0698] mm2, P < .001, vs normotensive pregnancies: 0.3565 [0.0763] mm2, P < .001) and microstructural development (median [IQR] ADC values: 1.47 [1.38-1.57] × 10-3 mm2/s vs 1.57 [1.53-1.63] × 10-3 mm2/s, P = .009, vs 1.63 [1.50-1.70] × 10-3 mm2/s, P < .001) in all groups. Furthermore, significant associations were found between structural abnormality of the splenium region and adverse perinatal outcomes in the PE or GH with FGR group (mean [SD] ADC value: 1.40 [0.07] × 10-3 mm2/s; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that, in fetuses with FGR in pregnancies with PE or GH, decreased structural development of the CC, predominantly the splenium region, may be significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes and may be regarded as an MRI-based biomarker for better prenatal counseling and early management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.