ArticlePulmonary therapy2022
Treatment with the P2X3-Receptor Antagonist Gefapixant for Acute Cough in Induced Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03569033 (A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of MK-7264 on Acute Cough in Participants With Induced Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of MK-7264 on Acute Cough in Participants With Induced Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective P2X3 versus dual P2X2/3 receptor antagonists in refractory chronic cough: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Purinergic signalling · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Pooled it
- Well-Established and Traditional Use of Vegetal Extracts as an Approach to the "Deep Roots" of Cough.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Therapeutic Landscape in Chronic Cough.Lung · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAvailable therapies for acute cough, a condition frequently caused by a viral upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), have shown limited evidence of efficacy. Gefapixant, a P2X3-receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in studies of the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough, but its efficacy for treating acute cough has not been previously studied.
methodsThis was a phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pilot study. Healthy volunteers were randomized 1:1 to receive twice-daily gefapixant 45 mg or placebo and inoculated with human rhinovirus 16 to induce URTI and cough. Participants were observed while quarantined for 7 days after the start of treatment. The primary endpoint was awake cough frequency on day 3, which was objectively measured with a cough-recording device. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to day 3 in subjective cough severity measures (cough severity visual analog scale, Cough Severity Diary) and cough-specific quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire-acute).
resultsOf the 46 participants who met inclusion criteria [mean (standard deviation, SD) age, 24.6 (6.5) years; females, n = 8], 40 completed the study (gefapixant, n = 21; placebo, n = 19). There was no significant difference in awake cough frequency on day 3 between the gefapixant and placebo groups [least squares means, 2.4 versus 2.7 coughs per hour, respectively; mean difference (95% confidence interval, CI), -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7); P = 0.75]. There were no significant between-group differences for any of the secondary endpoints. Peak cough frequency was low and occurred later in the study than expected (days 4-5). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous studies of gefapixant.
conclusionCompared with placebo, gefapixant did not reduce the frequency or severity of acute cough secondary to induced URTI. Induced viral URTI produced mild symptoms, including lower cough frequency than observed in previous studies of patients selected for acute cough associated with naturally occurring URTI.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03569033; EudraCT, 2017-000472-28; protocol number, MK-7264-013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.