Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969168›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Digital Global Recruitment for Women's Health Research: Cross-sectional Study.

Erika Rodriguez, Komal Peer, Victoria Fruh, Kaitlyn James, Anna Williams, Alexis de Figueiredo Veiga, Michael R Winter, Amanda Shea, Ann Aschengrau, Kevin J Lane and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Erika Rodriguez *Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4684-4180
Komal Peer *Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9685-4910
Victoria FruhDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-7230
Kaitlyn JamesDeborah Kelly Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-372X
Anna WilliamsDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3609-4355
Alexis de Figueiredo VeigaDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4761-1311
Michael R WinterBiostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-4714
Amanda SheaClue by BioWink GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-8841
Ann AschengrauDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-7712
Kevin J LaneDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-6811
Shruthi MahalingaiahDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5527-5787

Funding

Training Program in Environmental EpidemiologyT32ES007069 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI LADEN, FRANCINE · 1985 to 2024
$13.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increased popularity of mobile menstrual tracking apps and boosted Facebook posts, there is a unique opportunity to recruit research study participants from across the globe via these modalities to evaluate women's health. However, no studies to date have assessed the feasibility of using these recruitment sources for epidemiological research on ovulation and menstruation.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruiting a diverse sample of women to an epidemiological study of ovulation and menstruation (OM) health (OM Global Health Study) using digital recruitment sources. The feasibility and diversity were assessed via click and participation rates, geographic location, BMI, smoking status, and other demographic information.

methodsParticipants were actively recruited via in-app messages using the menstrual tracking app Clue (BioWink GmbH) and a boosted Facebook post by DivaCup (Diva International Inc.). Other passive recruitment methods also took place throughout the recruitment period (eg, email communications, blogs, other social media). The proportion of participants who visited the study website after viewing and clicking the hypertext link (click rates) in the in-app messages and boosted Facebook post and the proportion of participants who completed the surveys per the number of completed consent and eligibility screeners (participation rates) were used to quantify the success of recruiting participants to the study website and study survey completion, respectively. Survey completion was defined as finishing the pregnancy and birth history section of the OM Global Health Study questionnaire.

resultsThe recruitment period was from February 27, 2018, through January 24, 2020. In-app messages and the boosted Facebook post were seen by 104,000 and 21,400 people, respectively. Overall, 215 participants started the OM Global Health Study survey, of which 140 (65.1%), 39 (18.1%), and 36 (16.8%) participants were recruited via the app, the boosted Facebook post, and other passive recruitment methods, respectively. The click rate via the app was 18.9% (19,700 clicks/104,000 ad views) and 1.6% via the boosted Facebook post (340 clicks/21,400 ad views.) The overall participation rate was 44.6% (198/444), and the average participant age was 21.8 (SD 6.1) years. In terms of geographic and racial/ethnic diversity, 91 (44.2%) of the participants resided outside the United States and 147 (70.7%) identified as non-Hispanic White. In-app recruitment produced the most geographically diverse stream, with 44 (32.8%) of the 134 participants in Europe, 77 (57.5%) in North America, and 13 (9.8%) in other parts of the world. Both human error and nonhuman procedural breakdowns occurred during the recruitment process, including a computer programming error related to age eligibility and a hacking attempt by an internet bot.

conclusionsIn-app messages using the menstrual tracking app Clue were the most successful method for recruiting participants from many geographic regions and producing the greatest numbers of started and completed surveys. This study demonstrates the utility of digital recruitment to enroll participants from diverse geographic locations and provides some lessons to avoid technical recruitment errors in future digital recruitment strategies for epidemiological research.

Indexed as

attritiondigital healthdigital recruitmenteHealthepidemiology researchFacebookhealth apphealth applicationhealth technologyin-app messageinternetmenstrualmenstrual healthmenstrual tracking appmenstruationmHealthmobile healthovulationparticipantparticipationrecruitreproductionreproductive healthresearch subjectsocial mediatracking appwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID35969168
PMCPMC9520381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.