Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35969045›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2022

Meningococcal Urethritis: Old and New.

Bethany L Burns, Daniel D Rhoads

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Urology case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Urethritis-spectrum of pathogens, diagnostics and treatment].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Continuing genomic evolution of theMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bethany L BurnsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-7448
Daniel D RhoadsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-5191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neisseria meningitidis is a common commensal bacterium found in the respiratory tract, but it can also cause severe, invasive disease. Vaccines have been employed which have been successful in helping to prevent invasive disease caused by encapsulated N. meningitidis from the A, C, W, Y, and B serogroups. Currently, nonencapsulated N. meningitidis groups are more common commensals in the population than in the prevaccine era. One emerging nonencapsulated group of bacteria is the U.S. N. meningitidis urethritis clade (US_NmUC), which can cause meningococcal urethritis in men. US_NmUC has unique genotypic and phenotypic features that may increase its fitness in the male urethra. It is diagnostically challenging to identify and distinguish meningococcal urethritis from Neisseria gonorrhoeae, as the clinical presentation and microbiological findings are overlapping. In this review, the history of meningococcal urethritis, emergence of US_NmUC, laboratory diagnosis, and clinical treatment are all explored.

Indexed as

Meningococcal InfectionsNeisseria meningitidisUrethritisHumansMaleNeisseria gonorrhoeaeSerogroupUrethrameningococcal urethritisNeisseria meningitidisurethritisUS_NmUC

Identifiers

PMID35969045
PMCPMC9667755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.