ArticleJournal of radiation research2022
Effects of internal exposure to neutron-activated 56MnO2 powder on locomotor activity in rats.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Features of internal absorbed dose microdistribution in biological tissue irradiated by 31SiO2 microparticles compared with dose microdistribution from exposure to 56MnO2 particles.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- Internal radiation dose estimates in organs of Wistar rats exposed to sprayed neutron-activated 31SiO2 microparticles: first results of international multicenter study.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
- The overview of neutron-induced 56Mn radioactive microparticle effects in experimental animals and related studies.Journal of radiation research · 2022Article
- Overview and analysis of internal radiation dose estimates in experimental animals in a framework of international studies of the sprayed neutron-induced 56Mn radioactive microparticles effects.Journal of radiation research · 2022Article
- Pathological observation of the effects of exposure to radioactive microparticles on experimental animals.Journal of radiation research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At the detonation of the atomic bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a significant amount of radionuclides was produced by the neutron induced activation. The residual radiation from the explosion is crucial to the health risk of the people who entered these cities after the bombing and might have inhaled these radioactive materials. Because 56Mn is one of the major radionuclides produced in soil and have not been studied until now, we had conducted a series of experiments using rats to investigate the biological impacts of exposure of 56MnO2 particles. In these experiments, the rats' spontaneous locomotor activity was also assessed to examine the possible effects of 56Mn on their behavior. However, the locomotor activity data obtained from an individual experiment failed to identify radiation effects due to the large variation among animals and the small sample size. In the present study, all available data from our previous studies on 56MnO2 exposure (0.02-0.15 Gy of whole-body doses) as well as 60Co-γ exposure (at 2-5 Gy of whole-body doses) were pooled. Our statistical method, which takes into account individual differences and daily fluctuations, successfully identified a decrease in locomotor activity caused by 56MnO2 exposure, where the changes were gradual and reached the maximum reduction around 2 weeks after exposure. In contrast, exposure to 60Co-γ rays produced the highest decline of activity within one day. These results suggest that internal exposure to 56Mn at whole-body doses of even less than 0.15 Gy may have a long-lasting impact on locomotor activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.