ArticleJournal of radiation research2022
Solid cancer mortality risk among a cohort of Hiroshima early entrants after the atomic bombing, 1970-2010: implications regarding health effects of residual radiation.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodological considerations on the estimation of non-initial radiation effects among Hiroshima atomic bomb survivors: a commentary on Ohtaki et al. (2025).Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Gene Expression Changes in the Spleen, Lungs, and Liver of Wistar Rats Exposed to β-EmittedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Features of internal absorbed dose microdistribution in biological tissue irradiated by 31SiO2 microparticles compared with dose microdistribution from exposure to 56MnO2 particles.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- Effects of non-initial radiation exposure on solid cancer mortality risk among Hiroshima A-bomb survivors.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Internal radiation dose estimates in organs of Wistar rats exposed to sprayed neutron-activated 31SiO2 microparticles: first results of international multicenter study.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
- Contribution of radioactive particles to the post-explosion exposure of atomic bomb survivors implied from their stable chromosome aberration rates.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Effects of RadioactiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Effects of Internal Exposure of RadioactiveCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Pathological observation of the effects of exposure to radioactive microparticles on experimental animals.Journal of radiation research · 2022Review
- Effects of internal exposure to neutron-activated 56MnO2 powder on locomotor activity in rats.Journal of radiation research · 2022Article
- The overview of neutron-induced 56Mn radioactive microparticle effects in experimental animals and related studies.Journal of radiation research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are two types of exposure to atomic bomb (A-bomb) radiation: exposure to initial radiation released at the time of the detonation of the bomb, and exposure to residual radiation, which remains afterwards. Health hazards caused by exposure from residual radiation have not yet been clarified. The purpose of our study was to reveal the relationships between mortality risk from solid cancer and residual radiation based on data from the early entrants to Hiroshima. It is hard to identify the individual residual radiation doses. However, these are assumed to depend on the date of entry and the entrants' behavior. Individual behavior is thought to be closely related to gender and age at exposure. We investigated a cohort of 45 809 individuals who were living in Hiroshima Prefecture on 1 January 1970 and were registered on the Database of Atomic Bomb Survivors as entrants after the bombing. Poisson regression methods were used to estimate excess relative risks (ERR) with data cross-classified by sex, age at entry, and date of entry. In males in their 20s, 30s, and 40s at entry and in females less than 10 years old and in their 40s at entry, solid cancer mortality risks were significantly higher among persons who entered the city on the day of the bombing than those who entered three or more days later. With adjustments for the age-dependent sensitivities to radiation exposure, it was extrapolated that middle-aged people who entered the city on the day of the bombing were exposed to higher levels of residual radiation than younger people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.