Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968478›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Mental health problems and needs of frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: A qualitative analysis.

Roberto Mediavilla, Anna Monistrol-Mula, Kerry R McGreevy, Mireia Felez-Nobrega, Audrey Delaire, Pablo Nicaise, Santiago Palomo-Conti, Carmen Bayón, María-Fe Bravo-Ortiz, Beatriz Rodríguez-Vega and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Roberto MediavillaDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Anna Monistrol-MulaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Kerry R McGreevyDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Mireia Felez-NobregaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Audrey DelaireInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pablo NicaiseInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Santiago Palomo-ContiResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen BayónDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
María-Fe Bravo-OrtizDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz Rodríguez-VegaDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Anke WitteveenDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marit SijbrandijDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Giulia TurriniDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marianna PurgatoDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Cécile VuillermozSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Research Team on Social Epidemiology, Paris, France.
Maria MelchiorSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Research Team on Social Epidemiology, Paris, France.
Papoula Petri-RomãoLeibniz Institute of Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Jutta Stoffers-WinterlingLeibniz Institute of Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Richard A BryantSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David McDaidCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
A-La ParkCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
José Luis Ayuso-MateosDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
RESPOND Consortium
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research · DELondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBSorbonne Université · FRUCLouvain · BEUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversity of Verona · ITVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu · ESUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) from COVID-19 hotspots worldwide have reported poor mental health outcomes since the pandemic's beginning. The virulence of the initial COVID-19 surge in Spain and the urgency for rapid evidence constrained early studies in their capacity to inform mental health programs accurately. Here, we used a qualitative research design to describe relevant mental health problems among frontline HCWs and explore their association with determinants and consequences and their implications for the design and implementation of mental health programs. Materials and methods: Following the Programme Design, Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation (DIME) protocol, we used a two-step qualitative research design to interview frontline HCWs, mental health experts, administrators, and service planners in Spain. We used Free List (FL) interviews to identify problems experienced by frontline HCWs and Key informant (KI) interviews to describe them and explore their determinants and consequences, as well as the strategies considered useful to overcome these problems. We used a thematic analysis approach to analyze the interview outputs and framed our results into a five-level social-ecological model (intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public health). Results: We recruited 75 FL and 22 KI interviewees, roughly balanced in age and gender. We detected 56 themes during the FL interviews and explored the following themes in the KI interviews: fear of infection, psychological distress, stress, moral distress, and interpersonal conflicts among coworkers. We found that interviewees reported perceived causes and consequences across problems at all levels (intrapersonal to public health). Although several mental health strategies were implemented (especially at an intrapersonal and interpersonal level), most mental health needs remained unmet, especially at the organizational, community, and public policy levels. Conclusions: In keeping with available quantitative evidence, our findings show that mental health problems are still relevant for frontline HCWs 1 year after the COVID-19 pandemic and that many reported causes of these problems are modifiable. Based on this, we offer specific recommendations to design and implement mental health strategies and recommend using transdiagnostic, low-intensity, scalable psychological interventions contextually adapted and tailored for HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelHumansMental HealthPandemicsSpainCOVID-19free list interviewshealthcare workers (HCWs)key informant interviewsmental healthoccupational healthpsychological distressqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID35968478
PMCPMC9363705
OpenAlexW4288067140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.