Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968381›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2022

The effect of photobiomodulation on the brain during wakefulness and sleep.

Cecile Moro, Audrey Valverde, Marjorie Dole, Jaimie Hoh Kam, Catherine Hamilton, Ann Liebert, Brian Bicknell, Alim-Louis Benabid, Pierre Magistretti, John Mitrofanis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Cecile MoroFDD and CEA-LETI, Clinatec, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Audrey ValverdeFDD and CEA-LETI, Clinatec, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Marjorie DoleFDD and CEA-LETI, Clinatec, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Jaimie Hoh KamFDD and CEA-LETI, Clinatec, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Catherine HamiltonWell Red Pty Ltd., Launceston, TAS, Australia.
Ann LiebertGovernance and Research Department, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brian BicknellFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alim-Louis BenabidFDD and CEA-LETI, Clinatec, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Pierre MagistrettiFDD and CEA-LETI, Clinatec, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
John MitrofanisFDD and CEA-LETI, Clinatec, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
CEA Grenoble · FRClinatec · FRAustralian Catholic University · AUCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRLaboratoire d'Électronique des Technologies de l'Information · FRSydney Adventist Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last seventy years or so, many previous studies have shown that photobiomodulation, the use of red to near infrared light on body tissues, can improve central and peripheral neuronal function and survival in both health and in disease. These improvements are thought to arise principally from an impact of photobiomodulation on mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial mechanisms in a range of different cell types, including neurones. This impact has downstream effects on many stimulatory and protective genes. An often-neglected feature of nearly all of these improvements is that they have been induced during the state of wakefulness. Recent studies have shown that when applied during the state of sleep, photobiomodulation can also be of benefit, but in a different way, by improving the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and the clearance of toxic waste-products from the brain. In this review, we consider the potential differential effects of photobiomodulation dependent on the state of arousal. We speculate that the effects of photobiomodulation is on different cells and systems depending on whether it is applied during wakefulness or sleep, that it may follow a circadian rhythm. We speculate further that the arousal-dependent photobiomodulation effects are mediated principally through a biophoton - ultra-weak light emission - network of communication and repair across the brain.

Indexed as

arousalglymphaticsinfrarednon-pharmacologicalred

Identifiers

PMID35968381
PMCPMC9366035
OpenAlexW4288077402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.