ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022
Dual role of ERK2/NF-κB signaling in TRAIL sensitivity.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Helping Apo2L/TRAIL in the Battle: Synergistic Therapeutic Approaches for Cancer Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Dual Role of the TRAIL-DR5 Signaling Axis in Cardiovascular Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Targeted Therapies.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Review
- NF-κB in biology and targeted therapy: new insights and translational implications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) signaling is a promising approach in cancer treatment. Although ERK and/or NF-κB signaling is involved in the expression of TRAIL receptors (TRAIL-R), the exact underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, we evaluated the role of ERK2 and NF-κB in the cytotoxicity of TRAIL during cisplatin treatment. Cisplatin treatment of neuroepithelioma cells (SK-N-MC) significantly induced ERK2 activation and increased TRAIL cytotoxicity via the upregulation of death receptor 5 (DR5) expression. In partial ERK2 knockdown cell lines that maintained only basal levels of ERK2 activity, cisplatin treatment did not increase ERK2 activity or DR5 expression. These findings indicate that induced (rather than basal) ERK2 activity enhances TRAIL susceptibility via DR5 expression. In complete ERK2 knockdown cell lines with no basal ERK2 activity, DR4, DR5, and DcRs expression levels were increased, and additional treatment with cisplatin did not further increase TRAIL-R expression. Chemical inhibition of ERK2 also enhanced TRAIL cytotoxicity by upregulating DR4 and DR5 expression. These findings indicate that basal ERK2 activity suppresses TRAIL-R expression. Both basal and inducible ERK2 activities regulate TRAIL-R expression via the NF-κB signaling pathway. Overall, our findings suggest that the ERK2/NF-κB signaling pathway has a dual role in TRAIL susceptibility by differentially regulating TRAIL-R expression in the same cellular system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35968322PMC9360224W4300656407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.