Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968300›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Automated measurement of the disc-fovea angle based on DeepLabv3.

Bo Zheng, Yifan Shen, Yuxin Luo, Xinwen Fang, Shaojun Zhu, Jie Zhang, Maonian Wu, Ling Jin, Weihua Yang, Chenghu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bo ZhengSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Yifan ShenSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Yuxin LuoThe Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Bigdata in Ophthalmology, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xinwen FangSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Shaojun ZhuSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Jie ZhangAdvanced Ophthalmology Laboratory (AOL), Robotrak Technologies, Nanjing, China.
Maonian WuSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Ling JinThe Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Bigdata in Ophthalmology, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Weihua YangThe Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Bigdata in Ophthalmology, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chenghu WangThe Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Bigdata in Ophthalmology, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the value of automatic disc-fovea angle (DFA) measurement using the DeepLabv3+ segmentation model. Methods: A total of 682 normal fundus image datasets were collected from the Eye Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The following parts of the images were labeled and subsequently reviewed by ophthalmologists: optic disc center, macular center, optic disc area, and virtual macular area. A total of 477 normal fundus images were used to train DeepLabv3+, U-Net, and PSPNet model, which were used to obtain the optic disc area and virtual macular area. Then, the coordinates of the optic disc center and macular center were obstained by using the minimum outer circle technique. Finally the DFA was calculated. Results: In this study, 205 normal fundus images were used to test the model. The experimental results showed that the errors in automatic DFA measurement using DeepLabv3+, U-Net, and PSPNet segmentation models were 0.76°, 1.4°, and 2.12°, respectively. The mean intersection over union (MIoU), mean pixel accuracy (MPA), average error in the center of the optic disc, and average error in the center of the virtual macula obstained by using DeepLabv3+ model was 94.77%, 97.32%, 10.94 pixels, and 13.44 pixels, respectively. The automatic DFA measurement using DeepLabv3+ got the less error than the errors that using the other segmentation models. Therefore, the DeepLabv3+ segmentation model was finally chosen to measure DFA automatically. Conclusions: The DeepLabv3+ segmentation model -based automatic segmentation techniques can produce accurate and rapid DFA measurements.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomatic measurementdeep learningdisc-fovea angleretinal images

Identifiers

PMID35968300
PMCPMC9363794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.