Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968277›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Tailored GuideLine Implementation in STrokE Rehabilitation (GLISTER) in Germany. Protocol of a Mixed Methods Study Using the Behavior Change Wheel and the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Bettina Scheffler, Florian Schimböck, Almut Schöler, Katrin Rösner, Jacob Spallek, Christian Kopkow

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06855186 (Symptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06855186 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Symptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion (STAR-C): RCT of In-person vs Telehealth vs Wait List Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2025 to 2028Enrolled222ConditionsMild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)ArmsSymptom-Targeted Approach to Rehabilitation for Concussion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bettina SchefflerDepartment of Therapy Sciences I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
Florian SchimböckDepartment of Nursing Sciences and Clinical Nursing, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
Almut SchölerDepartment of Therapy Sciences I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
Katrin RösnerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Jacob SpallekDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
Christian KopkowDepartment of Therapy Sciences I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Evidence-based guidelines are important for informing clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes. There is inconsistent usage of guidelines among physical therapists involved in stroke rehabilitation, suggesting the existence of a gap between theory and practice. Addressing the German guideline "evidence-based rehabilitation of mobility after stroke (ReMoS)," the aims of this project are (1) to describe the current physical therapy practice within the context of stroke rehabilitation in Germany, (2) to evaluate barriers and facilitators of guideline usage, (3) to develop, and (4) to pilot test a theory-based, tailored implementation intervention for the benefit of guideline recommendations. Materials and Methods: This study uses a stepwise mixed methods approach for implementing a local guideline. A self-reported online questionnaire will be used to survey the current physical therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation. The same survey and systematic-mixed methods review will be used to evaluate the barriers and facilitators of guideline usage quantitatively. Semi-structured interviews will add a qualitative perspective on factors that influence ReMoS guideline implementation. The Behavior Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework will be used to support the development of a tailored implementation intervention which will be pilot tested in a controlled study. Patient and physical therapy-related outcomes, as well as the appropriateness, such as acceptance and feasibility of the tailored implementation intervention, will be analyzed. Conclusion: This will be the first endeavor to implement a guideline in German stroke rehabilitation with a focus on changing care provider behavior based on the knowledge of current practice and determining factors using a tailored and theory-based intervention.

Indexed as

allied health professionalsguidelineimplementationrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID35968277
PMCPMC9363877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.