Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968211›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2022

Estimating the best fraction of inspired oxygen for calculation of PaO2/FiO2 ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 pneumonia.

Leila Kadkhodai, Mahmoud Saghaei, Mohammadreza Habibzadeh, Babak Alikiaii, Seyed Jalal Hashemi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Variable Cerebral Blood Flow Responsiveness to Acute Hypoxic Hypoxia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. The SpOJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Utility of Clinical Variables for Deciding Palliative Care in Paraquat Poisoning: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leila KadkhodaiDepartment of Anesthesia, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mahmoud SaghaeiDepartment of Anesthesia, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammadreza HabibzadehDepartment of Anesthesia, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Babak AlikiaiiDepartment of Anesthesia, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Seyed Jalal HashemiDepartment of Anesthesia, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) to the fraction of inspiratory oxygen concentration (FiO2) is an indicator of pulmonary shunt fraction. PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio is used to classify severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). With the same shunt fraction, P/F ratio decreases with increases in FiO2 which may lead to errors in classifying severity of ARDS. The effect of FiO2 on P/F ratio has not been investigated in COVID-19 pneumonia. In this study, we estimated the best FiO2 for the calculation of P/F ratio in a sample of patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods: Blood gas and ventilatory data of 108 COVID-19 ARDS patients were analyzed in a cross-sectional observational study. Using Oxygen Status Algorithm the calculated shunt fraction served a basis for calculating P/F ratio for different FiO2. The severity of ARDS determined by P/F ratios at each FiO2s was compared with the shunt-based severity to find the optimum FiO2 for calculation of P/F ratio so the resulting classification has the best match with the reference classification. Results: A FiO2 of 1.0 for calculation of P/F ratio and ARDS classification showed the best match with shunt-based ARDS classification. A regression model was obtained with the PaO2, patient's original FiO2, Hemoglobin concentration, and SaO2 as the independent predictors of the P/F ratio for the FiO2 of 1.0. Conclusion: This study shows a FiO2 of 1.0 as the best value for correct calculation of P/F ratio and proper classification of ARDS.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19mechanical ventilationoxygenation indicesP/F ratiopulmonary shunt

Identifiers

PMID35968211
PMCPMC9374145
OpenAlexW4300576869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.