Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968200›Full record

ArticleHigher education2022

(In)justice in academia: procedural fairness, students' academic identification, and perceived legitimacy of university authorities.

Michał Główczewski, Stanisław Burdziej

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Higher education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michał GłówczewskiInstitute of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jurija Gagarina 39, Toruń, 87-100 Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-4232
Stanisław BurdziejInstitute of Sociology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Fosa Staromiejska 1a, Toruń, 87-100 Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5486-9885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A considerable body of literature has documented the significance of fair treatment in terms of generating trust towards decision-makers across different institutional contexts. It has also been demonstrated that even young children are sensitive to procedural justice, and that experiences of both fairness and unfairness help shape young people's wider attitudes towards authority. In this paper, we seek to extend these findings into the academic context. We use data from two separate studies of university students in Poland. In study 1 ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10734-022-00907-8.

Indexed as

Academic identificationGradingLegitimacyProcedural fairnessStudentsTrust

Identifiers

PMID35968200
PMCPMC9360702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.