Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968039›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

The temporo-mandibular joint: Reconstruction of the condyle post-ablation.

Rhodri Davies, Luke Cascarini

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rhodri DaviesThe Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, E1 1FR, London, UK.
Luke CascariniGuy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, SE1 9RT, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ablative surgery of the mandibular condyle poses a unique reconstructive challenge for many reasons. The condyle and it's relationship to the TMJ is a unique, complex, functional and aesthetically relevant piece of human anatomy. Resection may be required for both malignant and benign pathologies; each posing a differing set of surgical variables. Particularly in neoplastic processes, there must remain a certain degree of peri-operative flexibility with regards to the extent of the resection, and forethought to the requirement for post-operative radiotherapy; both of which further complicate choice of reconstructive option and surgical or prosthetic planning. The cases involved can often concern paediatric patients, and an additional aspect to be considered is that of growth potential. In this piece, we will discuss the indications for ablation and the techniques involved. We will elaborate on the reconstructive challenges specific to reconstructing the condyle in post-ablative cases. We will then describe and analyse the established reconstructive techniques; aiming to provide a balanced view on the advantages and disadvantages. Our focus will include autologous options such as vascularised and non-vascularised free tissue transfer, and the non-autologous options of custom and stock implants. We will also touch on distraction osteogenesis and ramus osteotomies. Lastly we will look to the future and consider possible innovative techniques which may become available to the surgeon.

Indexed as

Ablative surgeryCondylePost-ablationReconstructionResectionTemporo-mandibular jointTMJ

Identifiers

PMID35968039
PMCPMC9372739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.