Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Estimating the sensitivity and specificity of serum ELISA and pooled and individual fecal PCR for detecting

Paisley Johnson, Lianne McLeod, John Campbell, Marjolaine Rousseau, Kathy Larson, Cheryl Waldner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antimicrobial resistance in genericThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Seroprevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  10. Producer attitudes regarding antimicrobial use and resistance in Canadian cow-calf herds.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paisley JohnsonDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Lianne McLeodDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
John CampbellDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Marjolaine RousseauDépartement de Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Kathy LarsonDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Cheryl WaldnerDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While Johne's disease (JD) is less common in beef than in dairy herds, consolidation is increasing transmission risk. Estimates of

Indexed as

beef cattleJohne's diseaseprevalencesensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID35968010
PMCPMC9372466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.